delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2013/07/25/11:36:48

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
q=dns; s=default; b=sCMiEuqjTW21DTLrle15BRDIcahXzOpuC+aytn/+2+E
135Vy9bD59ov/YlX9jSfT5X056SlbhqBokWUmw40W9ig1K9yflrINhkSEitGLuMj
fyFJX8QpYuWowJSsgd1I7xO1dpcZ4bhJSnA1I7NH6UY9/EKgpmlG62QWl2sbsL+4
=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
s=default; bh=kegl/cOWlELrgg+hYAK4SkEPxJQ=; b=HsQKpy4cLMWxqab/j
K0mYWs0BzwVFl8iNYRGo3fsvED3rtszUWilelZK4/P46xTZAy10vo0FdqpbvLbqc
wSymqPwJyyVuM4TZbU7GW+fAO7ZiI9PSEuLn9/6AHSFzIXCJ/Ia/Sq9fCbBRFEOV
Wv3Y3qHh1fSSDY2LMf89xDojGg=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:132.245.2.21;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:BN1PRD0512HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -5
X-BigFish: PS-5(z21eIzbb2dI98dI9371I1432Izz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz177df4h17326ah1de097h1de096h8275bhz2fh2a8h668h839h947hd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h1765h18e1h190ch1946h19b4h19c3h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1f5fh1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail99-db8: domain of coverity.com designates 132.245.2.21 as permitted sender) client-ip=132.245.2.21; envelope-from=thonermann AT coverity DOT com; helo=BN1PRD0512HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ;.outlook.com ;
Message-ID: <51F145E7.3000600@coverity.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 11:36:07 -0400
From: Tom Honermann <thonermann AT coverity DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: Process command lines for Cygwin processes no longer viewable in Windows task manager as of Cygwin 1.7.21
References: <51F08F9D DOT 6020606 AT coverity DOT com> <20130725082814 DOT GA5124 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <51F1265B DOT 1040704 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <51F133E4 DOT 6040506 AT coverity DOT com> <20130725151050 DOT GA6932 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To: <20130725151050.GA6932@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
X-OriginatorOrg: coverity.com
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%

On 07/25/2013 11:10 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:19:16AM -0400, Tom Honermann wrote:
>> On 07/25/2013 09:21 AM, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>> On 7/25/2013 4:28 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>> On Jul 24 22:38, Tom Honermann wrote:
>>>>> My suspicion that this started with 1.7.21 is based on Corinna's
>>>>> comments in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-07/msg00343.html and
>>>>> other anecdotal evidence of new problems occurring as of that
>>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> This is by design now as described in the aforementioned posting.  If
>>>> you want to see the command line of a Cygwin application called by
>>>> another Cygwin application, see /proc/$pid/cmdline.
>>>
>>> Would a patch to restore the previous operation based on a $CYGWIN
>>> variable setting be acceptable?
>>
>> I think this change should be reverted.
>
> You were relying on a bug in Cygwin.

Regardless if this behavior was intentional or not, the ability to 
retrieve the process command line from non-Cygwin processes is crucial 
for me.  Please work with me on this to come up with a solution.

> Older versions of the DLL did not
> provide the full command line.  It was only after the bug entered into
> the source code that it did.  Not providing the windows command line is
> an optimization for Cygwin programs.

As far as I can tell, the command line has been provided to 
CreateProcess going back at least as far as the Cygwin 1.5.x releases.

Given the cost of starting a new process, it seems unlikely that 
omitting the full command line offers much of a performance improvement. 
  Was there something about the construction of the command line that 
was particularly expensive?  Perhaps that could be optimized instead?

>> In my case, I need to be able to retrieve the command line for a Cygwin
>> process from a non-Cygwin process.  Reading /proc/$pid/cmdline is not an
>> option in that case.  I depend on the ability to, for example,
>> differentiate gcc processes that are running based on their command line
>> options.
>>
>> Note that strace is currently broken as well.  Running it against a
>> 'make' invocation:
>
> It's not strace that's broken.  That's just a simple fix to the DLL.

Ok, the user experience is that strace is not working as expected.

Tom.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019