X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=eSVeIqVz5ZA/INSrE79Gn1/Pqsb+JRWnow8p8po3gMa
	kYf3lOvl0pGTDkcxdZi5gvjjHdr7LZOLwcF/mN0QmuyxcN6p0/fDRCGfhJFF24hU
	jVscH2H9HxQoiAeObS9ODsEBct5iTE0IrF2zwgacq7BHVoPeKmqdVleFKSisotAg
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=UNzuhrJSTNy+zVjnWgSrJZY8crs=; b=isCW+3p1xoDEhK/03
	OVQklf2fo0w6FyNV/uoeCO5/AewESnFPXNix5CYvf5IJZUvfwok2b1qJOo1qQwiF
	RWMwl7cQBLKTBFbIKzKDx7QLLbWhczD7TNWXYTG4TzDa3NjBzoH9YswraCo9Le7p
	5dzrXKOBsnt7b2++ceCPYxHiDY=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Received:	by 10.68.223.34 with SMTP id qr2mr32827094pbc.75.1374529346900; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:	<51EDA743.3060003@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:42:27 -0500
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 64-bit mercurial?
References:	<51EEDF42 DOT 3020602 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca>
In-Reply-To:	<51EEDF42.3020602@cs.utoronto.ca>

On 2013-07-23 14:53, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> Hi mercurial manager,

That would be Jari, who hasn't been around recently and hence hasn't 
started on x86_64 packages yet.

> Is an official 64-bit mercurial coming soon? Meanwhile, is there any
> reason I shouldn't expect a wget/configure/make cycle to "just work" ?

Hg is actually a Python distutils package, which is also pretty 
straightforward in its own way:

http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/mercurial;a=tree

The subpackages are due to extra dependencies of some extensions; hg 
itself requires only Python and ca-certificates.


Yaakov


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -