X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=UIoWqk7nqarJYg5Ks4Vs3uBwFKWmcU3ZK0iM0TT9t+y
	VhRAHhIZtlODFtNgVSiQ9jyZ0k3ZBVMlEcAmMR3FBs74DAum8h4jU1TNRJmHuRBl
	xl++OuskH7XkWIqu3J5s36YNmehFmuUPQVtby22e6tBc5PIQtQH5Kb3R5ZvDA1A4
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=LtGdLj+rZU2FU3OOA5IvwpNj26E=; b=HExG217a4YvH15yEz
	MB+OXCHgDzAple4RIgU5q/+04szt2bXIrP8GVbyVO/i2HZfGkgA9gPZxMphyeLI+
	XhnhE9mTRZFEyMxTUKk6i3/YYjgbTFvo+3+vDwtpR1qxN+2jN6QsdtlWuhrNRgqT
	C27rq02iKgCGjIZbstuDjFVr1E=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Received:	by 10.66.25.102 with SMTP id b6mr22331485pag.129.1374427136800; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 10:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:	<51EC17FD.1020301@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Sun, 21 Jul 2013 12:18:53 -0500
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: passing -no-undefined to libtool with autoconf/automake
References:	<51EB9F35 DOT 4050408 AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<51EB9F35.4050408@gmail.com>

On 2013-07-21 03:43, marco atzeri wrote:
> As latest gcc's are not ignoring anymore "-no-undefined"
> and the configure halt with error if LDFLAGS="-no-undefined"
> is defined in advance

Right, as gcc no longer ignores arguments it doesn't accept.

> I am currently building packages adding almost at the
> end of configure.ac
[snip]
> just before  AC_CONFIG_FILES.
>
> There is any better/practical way ?

The "correct" way is to add -no-undefined to lib*_la_LDFLAGS variables 
for each library, which is portable and can be sent upstream (despite 
popular misconception, this flag is harmless on non-PE targets).  If 
that's too difficult (e.g. a package won't autoreconf cleanly), then if 
LDFLAGS is otherwise empty, then pass LDFLAGS=-no-undefined to cygmake 
(or MAKEOPTS).


Yaakov


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -