X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=MNPWl7nJBb9YDfMSp8Qvtw9Y/2jvZt3E3WNoTukaUNt
	KDt2R4uc55ZASBUHojaxS/PzQ7hloDCmTKusmeWUNIa1H9ZpyDLy6Rw1Zc8896zQ
	FydRjM0lh34yfz2TRWihBeQk6hF3KcUmU1l+kCTphE6/9hIdv4wwzyt3jHUMjAk8
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=FSgCMCLkrtTl3/nloBdnvLfVZ2U=; b=keZslzsoonoAF6lQK
	5UjC0BMJDBcMuZtXD9IGPfMSrmmQuo5UaR8JShS76w6Gf+EYD6XFlabOCc1EyA2n
	jIux4ENWZuHb0eFwLuH1v/9lPILYI3biMQJms7GsVWm84RndPbG0zrBOeHECEEuC
	U39tN6xxEd4URydw7Ep8CBkwdA=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Message-ID:	<51E5693E.9090207@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:39:42 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cygwin AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	mingw.org cross compiler [Was: problem with cvs binary?]
References:	<ks2e8i$idp$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <51E54596 DOT 5040400 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20130716131044 DOT GJ2712 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20130716131044.GJ2712@calimero.vinschen.de>

On 7/16/2013 9:10 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Are the mingw cross compilers still necessary, now that we have
> modern mingw-w64 toolchains?  On Fedora they aren't shipped since
> F17, which already came with mingw-w64 toolchains either.

No, in the sense that you could use the mingw-w64 i686 toolchain to 
generate 32bit "native" windows apps instead.

Yes, because the two toolchains are not mutually compatible (different 
ABI, different exception model, different threading library, different 
w32api/runtime library). If you are using a cygwin $host to develop, 
specifically, mingw.org-distribution compatible apps/libs...then you 
need the mingw.org cross compiler.

I don't know how many people that represents -- it might just be me and 
Earnie -- but I'm not ready to declare mingw(.org)-gcc dead just yet.  I 
at least want to update our current offering to something more current 
than 4.5.x, AND it's necessary on i686 because recent gmp/mpfr/mpc 
library updates have broken mingw-gcc.  If, after this update, we want 
to declare EOL on mingw(.org)-gcc, we could discuss that on cygwin-apps.

--
Chuck


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -