X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=fTO+sA
	UV2vNGzPXiyz79+lHwBZaDNdxbe0y4tGjsABOhMPf5C13n8X2PGB/JHnpoQ8vzM4
	9sz2024G+15PEy00gZDAtFRwJgfhs8Ze5ltP2kklIRbDam5PGl8eIzuQSRILW4E/
	EDQ4GX1DcALbpTNTnNy4+G1zbMKG1657YE0nw=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=ePloBWnTs508
	6/calXqGtTnAz0M=; b=E86g5PMu4Jwp7jYzrHSSxFE+rwenmPlZz+Lm/pAg9/CG
	zRPTF/TYQtaUYLG2suVqFLAqoomPMj3BPRWUNLPVLPZNypk/SaXi9Ifw+a4enSkM
	4zC9bank/RFILeQnXvcwXK+j4hP2qgJmWFEDjKwWSAnXEfSmvkJvhzev5ZUMk+8=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Received:	by 10.66.102.41 with SMTP id fl9mr35745412pab.169.1373495840050; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:	<51DDE210.5020201@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jul 2013 06:37:04 +0800
From:	JonY <10walls AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: i686-w64-mingw32-gcc 4.7.3: ignores __attribute__((packed)), regression?
References:	<51DDDC6B DOT 3090401 AT t-online DOT de> <51DDDFF1 DOT 8090709 AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<51DDDFF1.8090709@gmail.com>
X-Virus-Found:	No

------enig2XXWEEJLPDEPWGFVMLDBF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 7/11/2013 06:28, JonY wrote:
> On 7/11/2013 06:12, Christian Franke wrote:
>>
>> If #pragma pack(1) is used instead, it works as expected also with
>> i686-w64-mingw32-gcc 4.7.3.
>>
>> (Upstream?) bug ?
>>
>=20
> Likely, there are no cygwin specific patches applied for it, please
> check with gcc-help.
>=20

OK, found the issue, try using -mno-ms-bitfields. I am not sure if this
workaround is proper.

It may break things if you use win32 API and their structs, so please
contact gcc upstream to confirm this.




------enig2XXWEEJLPDEPWGFVMLDBF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32)
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=5NYO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------enig2XXWEEJLPDEPWGFVMLDBF--

- Raw text -