X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=DACUVbQjbuqBueQdoHdhVxtpdT3ZQNuyTjAl/cLxtUO
	1bYJSD7bVPvHMB16N5oKfnkwwTj1SOgVzXrMfIzIbl2CRaKln1tq8d31XyXAJa7a
	xQxE8aFselkKVmw1au4taHbzTgLOvGtQboLYqcE63W3n7yJToLf93IV5ykzX1TTw
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=LWqL2UK+wxwSQl1xMVQ2CP2MZls=; b=o1WLf5r65HW+sw9gD
	+Fi+WSNd/dEEzXPLfth/w3q7ncUWVfVFKav5X/0Wnn02n6487vrMnPJM5vAmP6gb
	P3fMtq0MnZWlRqPlnuNwEoFY6/TMlA39LEnxDyzHk2Uf3TsO/c4oKIY4g7x8Z1Z+
	bGzkY9IQCrLcEPNZpUiuRjn9Wc=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Message-ID:	<51D58AE1.1080001@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
Date:	Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:46:57 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cygwin AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: MSYS mode (continue)
References:	<CABEPuQJ6V55nLo1hHO=xxAjjxsV5ahAuHj-jfWH-=Hk_hmk-eA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130704085847 DOT GK5118 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CABEPuQ+YxNF6LTAxRTVDQqQsKvGWGuaRxx1JAH62+wZZzgsC9w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CABEPuQKRz2kamtrbBF5MjxPiSRMxwJ7NhG6wRrtRXMoBm+quNg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130704091632 DOT GM5118 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CABEPuQKb8ZFvA=5947_JNQ3xZUNi98FTkV=9Q04f8vMY-4q1pg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130704101046 DOT GN5118 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CABEPuQJ2S5jUbJDS+XUhrvdLtu6t53QAvsmQ_q5RbvELZxHJhw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130704103708 DOT GA12995 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CABEPuQ+iF265-SQzfLTmsBegG+BVjpLPowxRAH8ioWv1Us_iYg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130704121617 DOT GC12995 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20130704121617.GC12995@calimero.vinschen.de>

On 7/4/2013 8:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I'm ok with that, but I think we should drop the "32" from MINGW in
> the first place.
>
> Does anybody rely on the "WOW64" in uname -s output?  I just checked
> the scripts in /bin in my installation and none of it seems to check
> for that info.
>
> And then again, it *is* redundant, given the uname -m output...

cygwin64$ uname -s
CYGWIN_NT-6.1

cygwin64$ uname -m
x86_64

cygwin32$ uname -s
CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64

cygwin32$ uname -m
i686

Yep, seems redundant.

--
Chuck


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -