delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
DomainKey-Signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to | |
:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= | |
default; b=YMUFDxoO62Rjawx2GrMHB9wDmVEQz4VRyOa4+LMpZxeRTXp6nbOo0 | |
0K+4yM3rGMh7P2DV1coJZHs+yEbfvOEd2ezVUE1NmYwsOeZDDT1Nr0dy4f85Nzx/ | |
DqpiLNJsUxwa2s+XDh+XZt6AMhZXCkhYFw9UEMyVtQWGNjQjLClueA= | |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to | |
:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; | |
bh=mgw+VRf3yuuy62bHQZwRu4cmJFw=; b=UVqkoNURZfgmJa+1CFeW+tYCp3j+ | |
YeQIMfnZDby58xCpw9qoQQo3erZ+88rgyHRSsgSe/dq5xlNc/vXuyYNXtaCH7vdl | |
yncTGmd/1N8eKdgM91qPjKnyYYyIxsmNRyDrEgl858vX1Kwhd29LmpUP+bfI/sJo | |
56oO/FQ0VxeSZXA= | |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: | No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 |
Date: | Thu, 27 Jun 2013 19:03:36 +0200 |
From: | Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: autoreconf/gettext puzzle (was Re: sed match DOS end of line) |
Message-ID: | <20130627170336.GL2378@calimero.vinschen.de> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <01E9402441FFBB4BBEA0A82549A7D94A0C27C5 AT ORD2MBX02C DOT mex05 DOT mlsrvr DOT com> <20130627142405 DOT GA2378 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130627144952 DOT GB2378 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <51CC5D69 DOT 40700 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20130627155133 DOT GF2378 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <20130627155133.GF2378@calimero.vinschen.de> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Jun 27 17:51, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 27 10:42, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > > On 2013-06-27 09:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >Ok, here's me, even more puzzled. FIW, the 4.2.2 packages have *not* > > >been built the same way as the 4.2.1 package. The difference is running > > >autoreconf (4.2.2) vs. not running autoreconf (4.2.1). > > > > Were these natively compiled or cross-compiled? The latter pulls in > > gnulib functions in place of libc's (Cygwin) without intervention > > during configure. > > > > >If I build sed with the auto configury unchanged, I'm back to an sed > > >which handles the CR just as the old sed 4.2.1 package: > > > > > > $ sed --version | head -1 > > > sed (GNU sed) 4.2.2 > > > $ od -c eol > > > 0000000 e n d o f l i n e \r \n > > > 0000013 > > > $ sed 's/e$/X/' < eol > > > endoflinX > > > > > >However, 4.2.2-1 and 4.2.2-2 packages have been built running autoreconf > > >first, which, besides other things, updates the included gettext stuff > > >from version 0.17 to version 0.18.1. > > > > > >So I'm wondering if the latest gettext is the culprit here, but I'm not > > >fluent enough in the differences within gettext to see where the problem > > >is. > > > > I doubt it; as long as libintl is dynamically linked, the gettext > > build infrastructure just handles .po.mo rules. > > Yeah, I seem to be entirely on the wrong track, sorry about that. > > I'm just inspecting the sources and it seems that the read mode of > files has changed from "rt" to "r" between 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 for some > reason. > > I'm still digging, and I'm unsure how I could create a version of > sed 4.2.2 which did the right thing at all a couple of minutes ago. > > Still digging... I have no idea how I screwed up so badly while testing. It was actually just a missing "t" flag in a call to fopen which has been lost between 4.2.1 and 4.2.2. I just uploaded and announced 4.2.2-3 which should fix this issue, and I sent the patch upstream. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |