X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=LFrVxpKR6o3nn2Sn+C5ivS0LbctXG+KzMm8IeKmDG9s
	yRSumsVzFD+VpbE2NHveTSYFxRXchCuGs8c374Wa5u9fH1Edvt7BVKqpDZfZ1OsF
	HVSR64RJ/LSWSsKEH2ShCj7zbtddIL8LoQLeLmedTQlbFLXuOv6QfgVCdpjt0u1U
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=HOwwZYK6n3m3G2bQovFdcxhkN8Q=; b=XiAkulmH/2By21RKo
	f64v9P2BRP9NOdlxD8emzkKrDEbUhFqdnstMhyWs/t8rOj8WtXFsTi/vU3A6D9L+
	cCRrwofhmMcWltEfT8jbHUcfr7swz7BrgKjBpUCF3iR2hzdeOBXTqnxrBfw7EKhK
	CYPumf9/wgz3uO7BlDHIieD+Sc=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Received:	by 10.68.3.107 with SMTP id b11mr6664944pbb.118.1372347750297; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:	<51CC5D69.40700@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:42:33 -0500
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: autoreconf/gettext puzzle (was Re: sed match DOS end of line)
References:	<01E9402441FFBB4BBEA0A82549A7D94A0C27C5 AT ORD2MBX02C DOT mex05 DOT mlsrvr DOT com> <20130627142405 DOT GA2378 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130627144952 DOT GB2378 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20130627144952.GB2378@calimero.vinschen.de>

On 2013-06-27 09:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Ok, here's me, even more puzzled.  FIW, the 4.2.2 packages have *not*
> been built the same way as the 4.2.1 package.  The difference is running
> autoreconf (4.2.2) vs. not running autoreconf (4.2.1).

Were these natively compiled or cross-compiled?  The latter pulls in 
gnulib functions in place of libc's (Cygwin) without intervention during 
configure.

> If I build sed with the auto configury unchanged, I'm back to an sed
> which handles the CR just as the old sed 4.2.1 package:
>
>    $ sed --version | head -1
>    sed (GNU sed) 4.2.2
>    $ od -c eol
>    0000000   e   n   d   o   f   l   i   n   e  \r  \n
>    0000013
>    $ sed 's/e$/X/' < eol
>    endoflinX
>
> However, 4.2.2-1 and 4.2.2-2 packages have been built running autoreconf
> first, which, besides other things, updates the included gettext stuff
> from version 0.17 to version 0.18.1.
>
> So I'm wondering if the latest gettext is the culprit here, but I'm not
> fluent enough in the differences within gettext to see where the problem
> is.

I doubt it; as long as libintl is dynamically linked, the gettext build 
infrastructure just handles .po.mo rules.


Yaakov


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -