X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=a1CDdOi+EqwhoDs4yi8wkuChqqPfxMQcRjTxmnzK9coqtVTOS9eZZ
	C7hYyT9rONYEboux8RIlDCFgZJ4O/216+subadwZ7kN6mQNGH2D0GXGTKZqH+Zzi
	tr3EEPxowE1yNkx28enwO8OfH6ZY8O6LQ8pM208HaPSwjrD7tdyuUo=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=8IN76YJV7DvMKErMv3TwydL20d8=; b=S2WdO+ChOAvcve8DO8/hXXUwiuTG
	+UXXQj1c0QXvuWkkksx4ub03JtC4rP1jB7Xb532cnot7WCrF/ksEHIEUP41zWg+3
	h6HIH5H6jdUmA8HnBR1qrl513mWy2FZEOP+S6bGFXILj8ZOpgGMpGdHHYF3U3DLZ
	I6CP/ZbJjlARdm0=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Date:	Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:15:57 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: autoreconf/gettext puzzle (was Re: sed match DOS end of line)
Message-ID:	<20130627151557.GD2378@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<01E9402441FFBB4BBEA0A82549A7D94A0C27C5 AT ORD2MBX02C DOT mex05 DOT mlsrvr DOT com> <20130627142405 DOT GA2378 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130627144952 DOT GB2378 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20130627144952.GB2378@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Jun 27 16:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jun 27 16:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jun 27 13:28, Paul Becker wrote:
> > > > From: On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
> > > > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 6:49 AM
> > > > Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: sed-4.2.2-2
> > > > 
> > > > I've just updated the Cygwin 32 and 64 bit version of sed to 4.2.2-2.
> > > 
> > > Since this 'sed' change, I noticed that "$" does not match a dos formatted file end-of-line anymore.
> > > 
> > > example:
> > > echo "endofline^M" | sed "s/e$/X/"
> > > 
> > > sed 4.2.1 returns
> > >    endoflinX
> > > 
> > > sed 4.2.2 returns
> > >    endofline
> > 
> > This seems to be an upstream change.  The Cygwin 4.2.1 and 4.2.2
> > releases are build the same way.  4.2.1-2 (-3 on 64 bit) and 4.2.2-1 are
> > both built from just the vanilla upstream sources.
> > 
> > While 4.2.2-2 adds the latest upstream gnulib regex, it behaves
> > otherwise identically to 4.2.2-1.  And both 4.2.2 releases show the same
> > behaviour in terms of CRLF line endings.
> > 
> > But it's really puzzeling.  There's no indication for this change
> > in the sources.
> 
> Ok, here's me, even more puzzled.  FIW, the 4.2.2 packages have *not*
> been built the same way as the 4.2.1 package.  The difference is running
> autoreconf (4.2.2) vs. not running autoreconf (4.2.1).
> 
> If I build sed with the auto configury unchanged, I'm back to an sed
> which handles the CR just as the old sed 4.2.1 package:
> 
>   $ sed --version | head -1
>   sed (GNU sed) 4.2.2
>   $ od -c eol
>   0000000   e   n   d   o   f   l   i   n   e  \r  \n
>   0000013
>   $ sed 's/e$/X/' < eol
>   endoflinX
> 
> However, 4.2.2-1 and 4.2.2-2 packages have been built running autoreconf
> first, which, besides other things, updates the included gettext stuff
> from version 0.17 to version 0.18.1.
> 
> So I'm wondering if the latest gettext is the culprit here, but I'm not
> fluent enough in the differences within gettext to see where the problem
> is.
> 
> Chuck?  Yaakov?  Do you have any explanation or, even better, a
> workaround for this phenomenon, other than not running autoreconf?
> 
> Anyway, for the time being, I'll upload 4.2.2-3 packages shortly which
> has been build without running autoreconf, which will fix the CRLF vs.
> LF problem.

Easier said than done.  This only fixed CRLF handling for the 64 bit
version.  The 32 bit version, built without autoreconf, still doesn't
recognize the CR.

Help?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -