X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=NbWS7v8jAelMHEmKLIz91AGsLsiBSgEw2hLSpjyNiB6
	gkxAdtC9zfthqmJGyEaGiHOMBGWf1FU9xIIlXDbh89znDdunWkz655SA4NzkDIlQ
	m4s6+j5SGqO46VeZBtFlF76fcdXfqrYbYkqsZ1QRSbH9hF/I2qqvFK0zAASZ8aWY
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=C22bX0AoYkELrgcWEYgt2vhMsRM=; b=TPhbXcFdmugwTK83u
	DrtblqDCIit45CopV6/LdmVkSTy/Pn753Xp8vsC9OXvgn768ONe9saI3Rp3uY5Ue
	37b5UhsNplYKsVM3bfZV4kGFaCyf5qbirCi/oXXPOvsw5zC/75H3qhNPS0onRrBg
	c2txgBZcoWvQ79hv1p2NtpXKfM=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Message-ID:	<51C486BF.8020708@codespunk.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:00:47 -0400
From:	"Matt D." <matt AT codespunk DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Bug with Cygwin's 'quilt' is actually in 'patch'
References:	<51BFEB6E DOT 2040404 AT codespunk DOT com> <51BFF1F9 DOT 4040205 AT codespunk DOT com> <51C277A4 DOT 20709 AT codespunk DOT com> <20130620074638 DOT GD22578 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130621121154 DOT GA7362 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20130621121154.GA7362@calimero.vinschen.de>

Thank you. I took the time to make certain that I couldn't find any 
other lingering problems.

The update to 2.7.1 corrects the test case I submitted previously.

Thanks! :)


On 6/21/2013 8:11 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jun 20 09:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jun 19 23:31, Matt D. wrote:
>>> I've been looking further into this and it appears as though the
>>> problem is in 'patch' not 'quilt'. quilt is actually a collection of
>>> bash scripts and calls patch to do the actual patching.
>>>
>>> Using the same example I provided earlier in the thread, the same
>>> error occurs when calling patch directly:
>>>
>>> $ patch Imakefile patches/test.patch
>>>
>>> Running dos2unix on test.patch will allow the patch to apply
>>> successfully. However, this is WRONG. Imakefile and the initially
>>> created test.patch both use CRLF line endings. The patch should
>>> definitely NOT apply by introducing actual disparity.
>>>
>>> To summarize, the patch to Imakefile (CRLF) will apply if it is
>>> converted to LF line endings. Using the '--binary' switch seems to
>>> be a workaround for this issue.
>>
>> I can reproduce this problem on 32 bit Cygwin but not on 64 bit Cygwin.
>>
>> The 64 bit version has a newer patch version 2.7.1, while I so far
>> neglected to update the 32 bit version which is still on 2.6.1.  I'll
>> build a new patch 2.7.1 for 32 bit today.  I hope that fixes it for
>> 32 bit as well.  Stay tuned for the announcement.
>
> Matt?  Ping?  Does the new patch 2.7.1 help?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Corinna
>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -