delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2013/06/20/18:56:29

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
q=dns; s=default; b=OhnBM1OEy0HrApviq0e7rhSjJFCy97lB5rVA7Ft9PYh
4U9YMnDpc2XN3YxBzt0U3vURELloLPtkuIMlYUx42csF0yyTlOt33TYGR750o/uu
X1iC63sBwESWc76B3SNkoe9bRIA3SZJvE1SDcZdZ/YI8dstJtriyZ+PUGWrhaL0c
=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
s=default; bh=Aav2bP0kow0eyJrGhaQ6D31Ehzo=; b=Bf7HT/rqbnS5UYWEl
SyiBfrB3fB63RqWXiHyN9eYVGoGsnNRzj1wNZvQV5UIUrKqpW/nBTtmFVflhDvQH
KF+fwMcb+VN6rz+aw9lJdlDB3ihG2GV8FV0NpFLiKiq9z3NDoag/Sy2EfzLaRiUF
9ugNGLgQ0ZrfpOqfG6+Z4Fts9U=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.secure-endpoints.com, Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:56:04 -0400
X-Spam-Processed: mail.secure-endpoints.com, Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:56:04 -0400 (not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source)
X-Return-Path: jaltman AT openafs DOT org
X-Envelope-From: jaltman AT openafs DOT org
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <51C38880.3090401@openafs.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:56:00 -0400
From: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman AT openafs DOT org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Heimdal 1.5.2: "unknown mech-code 2529639054 for mech 1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10"
References: <409A0E510096B044A0EE3778BB3F1F5C01379C903ECD AT EXMAIL DOT hrl DOT com> <51C33835 DOT 6000207 AT openafs DOT org> <409A0E510096B044A0EE3778BB3F1F5C01379C904127 AT EXMAIL DOT hrl DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <409A0E510096B044A0EE3778BB3F1F5C01379C904127@EXMAIL.hrl.com>

On 6/20/2013 6:31 PM, Nogin, Aleksey wrote:
> Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> 
>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent
>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received
>>> debug1: Authentications that can continue: 
>>> publickey,gssapi-with-mic,password
>>> debug1: Next authentication method: gssapi-with-mic
>>> debug1:  Miscellaneous failure (see text) unknown mech-code 2529639054 for mech 1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10
>>>
>>> debug1: Delegating credentials
>>> debug1: Delegating credentials
>>> debug1: Enabling compression at level 6.
>>> debug1: Authentication succeeded (gssapi-with-mic).
>>> Authenticated to XXXhostXXX ([IP.IP.IP.IP]:22).
>>
>> I'm not sure what the issue is here.  The authentication succeeded.
> 
> The issue that despite the "Delegating credentials" message, credentials are not being delegated.
> 
> Aleksey


I still do not understand what does that has to do with the subject of
this message?

The credentials that will be deleted are the credentials of the type
that was accepted by the ssh gssapi-with-mic mechanism.  At the
verbosity level that you are using it does not state what that is.

In any case, I am quite sure that if your ssh client states that it has
delegated credentials that it has done so.   You need to debug the
server side to determine where the sshd environment or gssapi library
has determined the credentials have been stored.   For Kerberos it will
need to be a credential cache.  Heimdal defaults to using a non-FILE
based cache but I suspect that Cygwin does not provide a non-FILE based
cache implementation.

Jeffrey Altman



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019