X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=vECOUk0897wej0mx155YI2da+hISe4+A7ZPZVCbIA1IzgDbuJ0A0o
	bLqN8lPQVAgjgGyhjq88D83pxb7/QgCDg4YR+RJzAD7UI2Q+eZVBwtWKDaaYMqQP
	Jm9J1MyhyuXZ8KulIXMicXdLPG2mt5zejulMaAhN/zSlLn78eoJVEc=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=qxvPLxu/T9Mo04XoLnqBn0xZULc=; b=d+HjLItoW7nr47beZYs/taI27eQu
	QwXYCGeQcFdpMyV3X7ny7LWXczYvxxBY6S+ylMGEPqnSxOtVGlT+WQqtt4fSfZ7m
	YxwvVOMQfaXigxxfP3hfd1gpjkjngtuGkjDa+bFLMj2nEAXWfG62FLJnSp5OQRS7
	/RgqALAiLKzVsss=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Mail-Handler:	Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To:	abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User:	U2FsdGVkX19RgxYGPyvshCBODyiBEdF8
Date:	Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:47:15 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Bug with Cygwin's 'quilt' is actually in 'patch'
Message-ID:	<20130620054715.GC5122@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<51BFEB6E DOT 2040404 AT codespunk DOT com> <51BFF1F9 DOT 4040205 AT codespunk DOT com> <51C277A4 DOT 20709 AT codespunk DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<51C277A4.20709@codespunk.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:31:48PM -0400, Matt D. wrote:
>I've been looking further into this and it appears as though the problem 
>is in 'patch' not 'quilt'. quilt is actually a collection of bash 
>scripts and calls patch to do the actual patching.
>
>Using the same example I provided earlier in the thread, the same error 
>occurs when calling patch directly:
>
>$ patch Imakefile patches/test.patch
>
>Running dos2unix on test.patch will allow the patch to apply 
>successfully. However, this is WRONG. Imakefile and the initially 
>created test.patch both use CRLF line endings. The patch should 
>definitely NOT apply by introducing actual disparity.
>
>To summarize, the patch to Imakefile (CRLF) will apply if it is 
>converted to LF line endings. Using the '--binary' switch seems to be a 
>workaround for this issue.

Sorry but we're emulating Linux here.  You shouldn't have CRLF endings
on your text file if you want the tools to work reliably.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -