X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=sYfpx47InM09mSa3bUGW+M4jsmuIkV0Uv9sUPThoydsI7RxFx/2zX
	eGEZ+o7Ze22ZPBq4NltufFgUTWemR+6KC3ybzEQiR0g8Z8koXyEC0IFfN8mYvAao
	8SUpuso+leEEwx81IxIPgK7IqJq60z7lILrKm8ViANTtpVLbqJLI9o=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=2Bufwd/T0TiLG3WI0Dyb0tb8nlY=; b=LfyTUMJ1FsJkvug02iFjY67wD6Zt
	5/CL/1XS1ENFT4ranXy638n9oZMCjJsyBbgE9zeW1DhkoKoX3B25sU9+bcgtrL7u
	rtcze3/73Rg4ig0veihS0akPT/ruFBs9EqY8HLT10nYHGOVhV3zhepvhfnCxIeLV
	ii3nCm5cbcH4Efw=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Date:	Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:15:27 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: UNC and POSIX paths
Message-ID:	<20130617151527.GA13457@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<003501ce6b5f$b41f2c10$1c5d8430$%fedin AT samsung DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<003501ce6b5f$b41f2c10$1c5d8430$%fedin@samsung.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Jun 17 17:36, Fedin Pavel wrote:
>  Hello!
> 
>  I decided to pay attention to one more problem. Lots of not very well
> written configure scripts and makefiles like to access things like
> '//usr/bin'. Under Cygwin this causes problem because Cygwin treats '//' in
> Windows-style as access to network shares.
>  What if we change this ? We could have a mount entry, something like '/unc'
> (or /smb, /net, whatever) and access it like '/smb/computername/sharename'.
> I think this would improve POSIX compatibility a lot.

Maybe there has been said enough in this thread already, but I have
to add this:  Cygwin's behaviour *is* POSIX compatible.  Consider
this excerpt from SUSv4 Base specifications, section 4.12 "Pathname
Resolution" (1):

  A pathname consisting of a single <slash> shall resolve to the root
  directory of the process. [...] If a pathname begins with two
  successive <slash> characters, the first component following the
  leading <slash> characters may be interpreted in an
  implementation-defined manner, although more than two leading <slash>
  characters shall be treated as a single <slash> character.


Corinna

(1) http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html


-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -