X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=vUgrCQYfAGHg/2uJ
	7kvCXT2AIXshVkdVBgFeW2PqPLPwg4ggHnz40Qpswm0VsNoDFcLrT8qzgcmwW3bY
	iyeNXKlnm9kXxEsf7dvQOj750q6jyvJjWHy5X98JdH83MiKFuWmOwFWnkjJY7qP+
	A3MJuZIjr7ppzJK/6STfE2Ni8yQ=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=sHmZSvUpwDC4Hz+itxbXbS
	bKNjY=; b=X3kYDXTvQgMzDq9rEVFoTaLrZnqFtsbKzyPj26iuJdMd0clFuK46Ve
	gdxSdWB2hJLQKovOc5VO3wLhcc0qFmbIVTYDDFLckoC+4cpQ/qlQKEpv0/RwMkfo
	Do4hcF8lihcRVILV2v8BUeN/87Rmgyb3PCnMWBB4k5OxjrYlNRybw=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,BOTNET,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BR,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RCVD_IN_JMF_BR autolearn=no version=3.3.1
Message-id:	<51BE7FCD.2090409@cygwin.com>
Date:	Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:17:33 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: vim-minimal annoyance
References:	<002d01ce6b05$f2f16d40$d8d447c0$@outbacktrip.info>
In-reply-to:	<002d01ce6b05$f2f16d40$d8d447c0$@outbacktrip.info>

On 6/16/2013 10:54 PM, Shaun Fielder wrote:
> Since the vim-minimal package came into existence, it's caused a fair bit of
> mucking around and frustration here (broken .vimrc; time to figure out
> what's going on). (Especially as each update wants to re-install vim-minimal
> which we don't want.)

The latest package of vim-minimal should use .virc for vi rather than
.vimrc.  This should avoid .vimrc brokenness when using vi.

This may not be all you're looking for but should, like I said,
address the problem of vi using an incompatible .vimrc.


-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -