X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=PIqtbjrp21IRUyMoSb4KeJ+s/CClFghYszI1MDN5BA5avYqpMiYEG
	95kuzCWtGA7gtjyfIEmq+Tc772xjIxLGhfg3sy7cGbn499eKDvjWH6M1C6o8GApK
	ilQ2GxZo6d7YuAIARzta4CaSmcPxyvjFy7nra52psefQA34ZGYjzho=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=8XKBHkzZnZrmU0Dm8B4mjtciFZ4=; b=aCuPkBeCF07rgNLd0lAo0S/rG63R
	QO/HB2COs+q+VIBq8/QGMKJIHIR0hqcEQgctHiiFfnpSNJMPYNMtx/SnmyAGEVkr
	dgTbZ2wI0VUtndzCe0nYlUi7xnHXxALQVulF2VZ+zf54duY+oXkEF3lDgd0cA2v3
	WcJD9wRsHurm+Rg=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Date:	Fri, 7 Jun 2013 09:56:32 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: ASLR breaks cygwin
Message-ID:	<20130607075632.GG13320@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<51B0B1F2 DOT 4090402 AT gmail DOT com> <75109671 DOT 20130606204049 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <CAPF-yOYFoZ6sjJgFEEg2hZ5zJSE4eP9mE3-+_NSifxgnyii8tQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <51B0C178 DOT 1050605 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20130606172711 DOT GE13320 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <51B0E64C DOT 3040602 AT cygwin DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<51B0E64C.3040602@cygwin.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Jun  6 15:43, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> On 6/6/2013 1:27 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Jun  6 11:06, Warren Young wrote:
> >>On 6/6/2013 10:52, Dan Kegel wrote:
> >>>
> >>>I wonder if we could get them to recognize the parent-child
> >>>relationship somehow, and keep the same address space
> >>>in the child.
> >>>
> >>>Just kidding.   Hell would sooner freeze over.
> >>
> >>I don't know about that.  For a long time, they had a bigger
> >>conflict of interest with Cygwin due to SFU/SUA/Interix and the
> >>POSIX subsystem. They announced SUA's doom a couple of years ago[1]
> >>and the need for a separate native POSIX API is gone[2].  I even
> >>recall reading on this list that Microsoft now recommends Cygwin, at
> >>least unofficially.
> >>
> >>Perhaps Microsoft now has some incentive to create a native fork(2)
> >>like call in their OS that Cygwin could use.  (Or something close
> >>enough, like Linux's clone(2).)
> >
> >The problem is not the call.  Such a call exists, since Vista even
> >one with very simple usage.  The problem is that this call has
> >been created for SUA, and some Win32 libs as well as the console
> >subsystem don't work with this call because there never have been
> >made provisions for a fork call in the Win32 libs.  Chances for
> >a change are rather low.
> 
> So I should put away my ice-skates and pitchforks?  Wait, was that
> a pun? ;-)

Sorry, I don't get the ice-skates pun.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -