X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=JJ0KnUptAJM/4guDAUs4O2eKTBdFn2ITdjVAm9DQJAR
	QPfj9aK6xs1OQyvVHl7R0CP359ACbgj4SVqUbK7wlC6FoFwKXC9fjsXFhbeKL05q
	fYPP2+IT6kRYmcrzkJp2n4S8gIwjGG/iZpHIfGdW5bQwfuq6nnwrNBxaeUbrA/pU
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=jJv+1mjm5E+vinFeXZ5t/0SOzGg=; b=q9Ux9lxjwEdrYqkwA
	xgNJHOJhBiPNCzaVDYocqwl23biLr85ddKIB+oqwXJLtu3MCqbL36XTEs3IevMZI
	W5vP3j7lbcB5SwjhFBiYpMzKWbNmj6Qn2cnQxcbU9ryTIT/ldvQhDhvFyDoKt+AZ
	o5YmnLX8xvGsQgJeIyKnRl6CFw=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Message-ID:	<51B0DBCB.4010005@etr-usa.com>
Date:	Thu, 06 Jun 2013 12:58:19 -0600
From:	Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [TEST] sqlite3-3.7.17-1 (Cygwin 1.7.19 locking feature)
References:	<51ACF886 DOT 10301 AT etr-usa DOT com> <51AD3BB4 DOT 2010601 AT acm DOT org> <20130604084128 DOT GB19572 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130604093749 DOT GA32667 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <51AF9A32 DOT 2030706 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20130606172218 DOT GD13320 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20130606172218.GD13320@calimero.vinschen.de>

On 6/6/2013 11:22, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> The lazy unlock request D tells the system to unlock all locks on the
> entire file.  This works fine with POSIX locks, but it does not work
> with Windows locks.  These require to unlock a lock exactly as it has
> been created.

I wouldn't be upset if you decided that was grounds for removing the 
code that tries to support mandatory locking for POSIX locks.  As far as 
I'm concerned, this is very much an experimental feature, and 
experiments often fail.  The failure already told us what to try next 
(BSD locks) and according to the one report received so far, it looks 
like it might fix it.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -