X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=bDUDiPPyWCZxAHq7
	gvWRlQg1yvWI4fTUiByj6daMqWILiN6bXHrZzUfFfKl9xJJ1aNaebcKjJaAwO514
	tiTGfq1GGVemPBRWXIMMDb3Y3SK/JFq2ts8QeUKprF8/NH/JyI/YuSFu+p9esyyx
	3T5PJI0W/W4jbkGeCl1yui1OLjE=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=uCAvLMzQSGCAxp3Uoyz+aU
	5j4GI=; b=doS7IGcRNVse84uZK3ygEjnKH3RcJpzqfOf+zE0go7CvvVejEzWmW2
	GorkX6kb4VZck8dVfYmB/O32boADF+er+iQn/uO9Ovi5LfKfZ+J5HoodFP3iTxwj
	9K9V7rEhAgsQ9s5jS/2o6+v2FHDZfcAXhQV8hyAtMLpfXwExN3ASE=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TW_FC autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Achim Gratz <Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de>
Subject:	Re: [TEST] sqlite3-3.7.17-1 (Cygwin 1.7.19 locking feature)
Date:	Thu, 06 Jun 2013 20:17:12 +0200
Lines:	20
Message-ID:	<87ppvzdryv.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
References:	<51ACF886 DOT 10301 AT etr-usa DOT com> <51AD3BB4 DOT 2010601 AT acm DOT org> <20130604084128 DOT GB19572 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130604093749 DOT GA32667 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <51AF9A32 DOT 2030706 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20130606172218 DOT GD13320 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)

Corinna Vinschen writes:
> In theory this scenario could be worked around in Cygwin by bookkeeping
> the present locks, plus a piece of code which unlocks all existing locks
> in the given range when a lock or unlock request is coming in.  However,
> the really dismal fact is, that an unlock before a lock would never be
> atomic.  If the F_SETLK request unlocks an existing lock and then
> another process gets a lock in the requested range, the first process
> ends up with a failed fcntl call and no lock at all.

Thanks for the explanation, I'm beginning to see what the backoff / retry
code in SQLite on WIndows is supposed to be doing (hopefully).


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf Blofeld:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -