X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=tBjltud5irDEs7nSYHI/dhz0kQu2w/OaMSop/j1YoKP
	QAws3hmVrJF2y8s32UV88RE0WHcyeddW3Nrw+cQ+CA4h0STn1HMRjW+A0tzhGRmy
	3lnyX8rsxzG6w/JbLpN3l/qVSZd7/YC2lz07XaHDJmCMMjzA9m5KbqxXxdeM3BBo
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=PJq5K5ygnj23wnEb2WqWdCfzsQM=; b=FjjEM5L/ujtesgavK
	opgEVfOCaGTT/C7He74HdT/BaoifdU2ygiblZZbwrLdxHxz2wpjRjlK0Eo7NwStj
	9NTK2pyRRYmXr+kA7D+1jSuKK1wr2sP0af2gMStnNwDr5BRy6f9hrUyCtQjLZOuE
	b0rKloG98Cy+2MpmHbcYIcI78E=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Message-ID:	<51B0C178.1050605@etr-usa.com>
Date:	Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:06:00 -0600
From:	Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Cygwin-L <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: ASLR breaks cygwin
References:	<51B0B1F2 DOT 4090402 AT gmail DOT com> <75109671 DOT 20130606204049 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <CAPF-yOYFoZ6sjJgFEEg2hZ5zJSE4eP9mE3-+_NSifxgnyii8tQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAPF-yOYFoZ6sjJgFEEg2hZ5zJSE4eP9mE3-+_NSifxgnyii8tQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 6/6/2013 10:52, Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> I wonder if we could get them to recognize the parent-child
> relationship somehow, and keep the same address space
> in the child.
>
> Just kidding.   Hell would sooner freeze over.

I don't know about that.  For a long time, they had a bigger conflict of 
interest with Cygwin due to SFU/SUA/Interix and the POSIX subsystem. 
They announced SUA's doom a couple of years ago[1] and the need for a 
separate native POSIX API is gone[2].  I even recall reading on this 
list that Microsoft now recommends Cygwin, at least unofficially.

Perhaps Microsoft now has some incentive to create a native fork(2) like 
call in their OS that Cygwin could use.  (Or something close enough, 
like Linux's clone(2).)



[1] http://goo.gl/4hrPg

[2] Presumably, gone with the 90's, when government contracts would 
sometimes require POSIX compatibility.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -