X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=DJtQK+EMSbJwpmaxcJaWcLZddkWi5yKDYJTrhkutf2Z
	/BbkKUlKzMzOSkh39tCfeW5cXtoapYRyT1x/Mpf5kY/AX1A5YYWVZRJgzXbcx/ck
	drWiIW4SD0i5z2/tuhdBgolwoM4F1IKn+5FVpKqOyqwqmjgIGGGfrKbZsynFIse0
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=DERJNOSBkR9x4tLvNI4C03THdFU=; b=p3glCfZUMQ/Zfm3hz
	QPYdU9yvvVvnz1Vd8jZlIJL3G4TQItVNcHZdoWOeB0W5kLukZpaGZdJ2uigs8VXy
	kz8GQWUV4icspAaU3HXWCrnnw8FjOgGm+0tuc4ZQ75sU1lJZSuQt4DgjaA1dsrZ/
	8utvrBVtIldBpd+agBmuQ1E/Hk=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Message-ID:	<51AF9AD4.80609@etr-usa.com>
Date:	Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:08:52 -0600
From:	Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Cygwin-L <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [TEST] sqlite3-3.7.17-1 (Cygwin 1.7.19 locking feature)
References:	<51ACF886 DOT 10301 AT etr-usa DOT com> <51AD3BB4 DOT 2010601 AT acm DOT org> <87ip1s1hxh DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>
In-Reply-To:	<87ip1s1hxh.fsf@Rainer.invalid>

On 6/5/2013 13:22, Achim Gratz wrote:
>
> David Rothenberger writes:
>> The good news is that the test cases that relied on temporary tables are
>> now passing.
>
> Yes, but that  is unrelated to the locking.

I was assuming that the switch from disk-based temp tables to in-memory 
temp tables helped because it avoided the need to do disk file locking. 
  In that sense, it is a way to fix part of the problem.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -