X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=rUeZzHB7RAylv/15yuihSLK1aSBzPokw28YTUL2h6lZ0ZxTtTfuAV
	xpktYX6TS20u9ebDYb5baXlmiwxZVHdUqAYjNOigj1WOw2yoJCG7IZn07PkfzSsi
	vo6bdW1hSd5XxwgbRqK25hz3vhcsV5f5uVihtKmrLr3Uvx/KP4TOCA=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=HIX1aO9pzI8ayzSA5bKY6iAsFpQ=; b=K7LjUdEr8FujGRTQpiJL4vgHEEwI
	7zgrTeqfQ4SO4hRrCRipbOS/CMyTY1y+8gGTDoJvoAkS212m3mAmEgN6R7Wc6EyT
	JkFzbu9LWbSeNCavENGy0wqx4s0kSeO0MvsdQDHn1NxrX+hqz517uf37hIWSxEco
	WiHHXDVlcMRoXz4=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Date:	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 17:36:11 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [TEST] sqlite3-3.7.17-1 (Cygwin 1.7.19 locking feature)
Message-ID:	<20130604153611.GG26857@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<51ACF886 DOT 10301 AT etr-usa DOT com> <51AD3BB4 DOT 2010601 AT acm DOT org> <20130604084128 DOT GB19572 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130604093749 DOT GA32667 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <51AE06E7 DOT 7080005 AT acm DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<51AE06E7.7080005@acm.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Jun  4 08:25, David Rothenberger wrote:
> On 6/4/2013 2:37 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jun  4 10:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Jun  3 17:58, David Rothenberger wrote:
> >>> On 6/3/2013 1:11 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> >>>> This is a big-push attempt at a version of Cygwin SQLite that will make
> >>>> everyone happy (ha!) whether they want POSIX advisory locking behavior
> >>>> or Windows mandatory locking behavior.  My part of the effort is being
> >>>> stubborn on this point and doing the basic testing and packaging.  The
> >>>> real magic was added by Corinna to yesterday's 1.7.19 cygwin1.dll snapshot.
> >>> [...]
> >>> ... initial results with the Subversion test suite (for 1.8.0-rc2) show
> >>> that most tests fail with a "sqlite: database is locked (S5)" error
> >>> unless CYGWIN_SQLITE_LOCKING=posix.
> >>
> >> The question now is: Why?
> > 
> > IOW: It would be nice to have a simple testcase (plain C, only Cygwin
> > POSIX calls, self-contained, yada yada) to see what sqlite expects in
> > POSIX lock mode.
> 
> This may take some time or be completely over my head given all the
> layers involved with the Subversion test suite (python bindings,
> subversion code, libapr1). I probably won't get to it for a few days or
> longer.

Thanks for the offer.  But really, it's not at all pressing, since it
would probably be mainly for curiosity.  There's just no way to improve
Windows locking.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -