X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=nE5QyX8VFbLiIQlYcziPZx8SrBDobrPZuvt4SzBktsK
	2MD2td9N53yNHlPW3f74Cit9c6hCbwK3N9mJAQnXwo2z0afAfUcpuQlt8c4Ayil0
	NhHifRK6Ou5YI1WbzDhcFDvkUeoYzfQLSIMCBWb8RLEINAG9bD+kWDAnGE8YZdhk
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=4NvD7arvPzEuYq34Rbs55ingDGI=; b=F7in/DsJtPRNjl8bB
	hUtylkmIjK0tZz69QbIFe33udm3JXu808WZHMMKHboh4esz413Ov6YhqizaDtu59
	rx0QbchxDckAfraMqOSFr9WLmA1HwdUS+A61vCLRiPEBTXI/ER4nSjsrjsWVDFqa
	xjIODZR634YTa02Zh7UWf7Z5xY=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-CornellRouted:	This message has been Routed already.
Message-ID:	<519FEC94.7060604@cornell.edu>
Date:	Fri, 24 May 2013 18:41:24 -0400
From:	Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: luatex font path problem
References:	<517D54B8 DOT 1060109 AT gmail DOT com> <517EA41F DOT 3040404 AT cornell DOT edu> <517F3170 DOT 3080107 AT gmail DOT com> <518977B4 DOT 1010803 AT cornell DOT edu> <519A94E0 DOT 5040808 AT cornell DOT edu> <519D792F DOT 2030402 AT gmail DOT com> <519E316F DOT 30301 AT cornell DOT edu> <519E597D DOT 8050800 AT gmail DOT com> <519E736C DOT 903 AT cornell DOT edu> <519EEB53 DOT 2080908 AT gmail DOT com> <519F5E19 DOT 40602 AT cornell DOT edu> <519FE1D5 DOT 3080801 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
In-Reply-To:	<519FE1D5.3080801@users.sourceforge.net>

On 5/24/2013 5:55 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2013-05-24 07:33, Ken Brown wrote:
>> I'm not comfortable removing the version test, since I don't know the
>> reason for it.  As you say, the low frequency of zlib updates makes this
>> a minor issue.
>
> If you were to rebuild texlive immediately, I would agree, but as you
> aren't planning to, right now it is a major issue: users should not have
> to choose between the important bugfixes (not to mention the new API) in
> 1.2.8 and a properly functioning luatex.
 >
> I agree with the conclusion in the Gentoo bug entry: the version check
> is completely superfluous and should be removed, so that this does not
> continue to be an issue in the future.

Having now read through the bug entry, as well as the corresponding 
thread on the dev-luatex mailing list, I agree.  So I'll rebuild texlive 
within the next few days and remove the version check.

Ken


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -