X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=ySE197eUYe1HEqtErUDMoNqM+Q7E4HLO2LM4jzGQAFZ
	wCd6UiU565YpFu3aW2vqQ5aACo+lqucAVD8fgxY9q/pldw8eFXC0MgCEfKBACY6D
	7vITpwsFYSpRUfk0t/xnqSwffIPFMrrOdSCVKUJ5nTPRd0KYflzKXSood9RltWx8
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=VHyxzQ9+XWdbLYhUtjvWgaf/IMI=; b=bieLbSMihooF3jQPL
	4oaJET7U4hKZElIXk/+74Q6n31Dz9JSDsSy6k2ApClRKY+QxwxRQaqLNpxBsIKvq
	DB802v1OepxeTytpbjxb72R1HQaRfMzZCiA8TBe1X/BCUJ+M2NPY5nAIYwASB2mv
	Aown0TRGxt4KMB3wKJI1fHZuBE=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Received:	by 10.68.250.229 with SMTP id zf5mr15779601pbc.148.1369369437960; Thu, 23 May 2013 21:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:	<519EEB53.2080908@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 May 2013 12:23:47 +0800
From:	Arthur Tu <arthur DOT jim DOT tu AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: luatex font path problem
References:	<517D54B8 DOT 1060109 AT gmail DOT com> <517EA41F DOT 3040404 AT cornell DOT edu> <517F3170 DOT 3080107 AT gmail DOT com> <518977B4 DOT 1010803 AT cornell DOT edu> <519A94E0 DOT 5040808 AT cornell DOT edu> <519D792F DOT 2030402 AT gmail DOT com> <519E316F DOT 30301 AT cornell DOT edu> <519E597D DOT 8050800 AT gmail DOT com> <519E736C DOT 903 AT cornell DOT edu>
In-Reply-To:	<519E736C.903@cornell.edu>

Is the check of zlib version essential?

I googled a fix that remove zlib version in gentoo.

http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-tex/luatex/files/remove-zlib-version-check.patch?view=diff&r1=text&tr1=1.1&r2=text&tr2=1.1&diff_format=s

However, according to the zlib changelog(http://zlib.net/ChangeLog.txt), 
the release with a  major version change, such as 1.2.7->1.2.8, was not 
so often. So I am fine with downgrading zlib manually, considering the 
low frequency.

On 5/24/2013 3:52 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
> That's annoying.  It turns out that luatex checks the zlib version and 
> aborts if it's not the same version with which luatex was compiled.  A 
> google search turns up many complaints about this. So I either have to 
> rebuild the TeX Live binaries every time zlib is updated, or else 
> users have to downgrade zlib, as you did.
>
> I think I won't bother rebuilding the binaries right now, since TeX 
> Live 2013 is probably going to be released within a month or so anyway.
>
> Ken
>
>
> -- 
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -