X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=YTEVr2F0b38uWX8hE7Bh7az43/Z3aKHvmCf5SxcVVoEM/fSvgbZ2t
	BdE9MCeVVzYcr6hecRLv8ukdGGlQ9XH524iPIfxiu6Wb9EpCBOEXvepk3p6t14JW
	S/X3fsY9SMnfemQJfwBf3qoTZ6v2STdht5T3knTN4NRbwM103Blov4=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=RbxOLLfYcdQFUOdfTH/yhYNU5Q0=; b=uQkIG2CulLRoAMJLdRj0q5FHlvKG
	lbxGui41OVS8WUt6465pI1li5AG3CVZUQw8ikj2FT+POHQ+V8SiLtYnQdcFWc3of
	nME4JVnQMavLJ7FutA/27+aYdmuLq8MUaIbC+j+hVqbtMFmUQ3f5ulv3hdnMkEqa
	diNATtdgHfZGVgg=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Date:	Tue, 21 May 2013 18:08:46 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Inconsistency with coreutils: _Static_assert()
Message-ID:	<20130521160846.GP2406@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<97bfaa4aab229c706de5732905c96b44 AT denis-excoffier DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<97bfaa4aab229c706de5732905c96b44@denis-excoffier.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On May 21 17:59, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I compile coreutils-8.21 under Cygwin (Windows XP). I'm using
> gcc-4.8.0 with no problem, except that under _any_ snapshot
> posterior to
> plain 1.7.18, i obtain the following (with plain 1.7.18, or under
> gcc-4.5.3 it works perfectly):
> 
> ---------------
> ...
> depbase=`echo src/chroot.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/&|;s|\.o$||'`;\
> gcc -std=gnu99  -I. -I./lib  -Ilib -I./lib -Isrc -I./src    -g -O2
> -MT src/chroot.o -MD -MP -MF $depbase.Tpo -c -o src/chroot.o
> src/chroot.c &&\
> mv -f $depbase.Tpo $depbase.Po
> In file included from /usr/include/sys/stdio.h:14:0,
>                  from /usr/include/stdio.h:62,
>                  from ./lib/stdio.h:43,
>                  from src/chroot.c:21:
> src/chroot.c: In function 'set_additional_groups':
> ./lib/verify.h:181:8: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
> before 'typedef'
>         _Static_assert (R, DIAGNOSTIC);          \
>         ^
> ./lib/verify.h:166:16: note: in expansion of macro '_GL_VERIFY_TYPE'
>      (!!sizeof (_GL_VERIFY_TYPE (R, DIAGNOSTIC)))
>                 ^
> ./lib/verify.h:230:25: note: in expansion of macro '_GL_VERIFY_TRUE'
>  # define verify_true(R) _GL_VERIFY_TRUE (R, "verify_true (" #R ")")
>                          ^
> src/system.h:247:35: note: in expansion of macro 'verify_true'
>  #define X2NREALLOC(P, PN) ((void) verify_true (sizeof *(P) != 1), \
>                                    ^
> src/chroot.c:103:16: note: in expansion of macro 'X2NREALLOC'
>          gids = X2NREALLOC (gids, &n_gids_allocated);
>                 ^
> Makefile:6662: recipe for target 'src/chroot.o' failed
> make: *** [src/chroot.o] Error 1
> ---------------
> 
> I have narrowed the problem down to /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h, where
> (line 271) you have _Static_assert defined:
> #define _Static_assert(x, y)  __Static_assert(x, __COUNTER__)
> 
> This definition occurs even under GCC 4.6.0 (and later) where
> _Static_assert() indeed works. As a consequence, it no longer works as
> expected in coreutils-8.21/lib/verify.h (lines 24 and 181).

Sorry, but I don't grok this sentence.  Since the cdefs.h version
works as expected, it does not work in coreutils' verify.h?  Who
exactly is wrong, cdefs.h or verify.h?  And *what* exactly is wrong
with the definition?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -