X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=dgwwN6G1XH36m8cGrvI2kILywlp928T6zSZi5P/uMZ4
	MUgo9gyKME0wN2r5bSpdWuTC7+6t0NvZpyxCy2KPTLJgMVuMAlARe/Mklc1HlPbu
	frS8iGeK0m+Ehrp11mi/hhEaKBMtzCsfpm/JvZZ/pJT3sNS9Ur4qh9EdDShzQLFk
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=y6S6xXB+Ewzh6hpMJczapqdSQ8c=; b=Ew7M4WYlJk1/J5szj
	Q2dA+u/cqfTRmTgzzj+4mtkmKrGEUWDlm7LXyyiyeDxrCyztsZuo+OJ+jjCqLGDr
	h0P7H5ijzbaLpjJapwCA/15m8wJIb3SPOleTIhPvgWcRVjcS2tYV/AZc3ca4jeSP
	6gbBC0zCAeCKxEOx5Sp0LY2kxI=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Received:	by 10.42.50.202 with SMTP id b10mr33068010icg.7.1369080531275; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:	<519A82D8.3060605@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Mon, 20 May 2013 15:08:56 -0500
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Difference in 32/64-bit curl.
References:	<51766C22 DOT 10702 AT bahnhof DOT se> <51770372 DOT 4070408 AT t-online DOT de> <20130424125930 DOT GQ26397 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1UUzp1-23sI640 AT fwd56 DOT aul DOT t-online DOT de> <51784CC0 DOT 7050304 AT t-online DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<51784CC0.7050304@t-online.de>

On 2013-04-24 16:21, Christian Franke wrote:
> The attached patch would actually fix the issue. Likely not the correct
> way to do this as va_arg(param, long) is also used for the other integer
> options.
>
> Is this possibly an upstream bug which is hidden on Linux et al. due to
> a different x64 ABI (which requires register parameter zero extension) ?

I believe it is indeed an upstream issue that affects more than this one 
option.  Care to take it upstream?


Yaakov


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -