X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=aLOP038Sl9I1G10Ic6c0LTk5VWeBW5A3vf6mrpr9Zg/Wn+OAhtMyl
	tJZBkdxeo72UfyDM+qoFLDlwyWEan85Akb8IxCOqm1S+RFIYGN9+z0D+2k2ZJT5M
	76l4UsQtB92s/AqhdUr93Iz0kiT7BDxwo6p5pQAAkcEqZ9cCT8iOqI=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=FfYrr0iGfrBz1DNYvMz3cpruATk=; b=BWR0QY5M6ybRRO+LvUkhZkZD2k8+
	rBY5ABKfmxFrnD6j8G7qUoQJdHi/9UCqN7lDz6Kr4mPXv8lmDGdHO8OYFgiQesT2
	Bi7X5/k3pMH0AP0uViM6a4kQYAZXUYJCdNWnlU/ubN2FqEaGLS5lzIY07Zirol4l
	9ItH4U/JWKELnPk=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Mail-Handler:	Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To:	abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User:	U2FsdGVkX182Gzjyk2N+OBtdobWFBx9a
Date:	Sat, 18 May 2013 13:01:44 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: BUG: Ability to access nonexistent directories
Message-ID:	<20130518170144.GA3237@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20130517083612 DOT GE21752 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <000d01ce52dc$74e54bb0$5eafe310$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <20130517102655 DOT GG21752 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130517145612 DOT GC7087 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20130517152206 DOT GL21752 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130517174857 DOT GB660 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20130517180022 DOT GQ21752 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5196B2F8 DOT 6090902 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20130518082809 DOT GB2406 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <2ab36a85d8004fdb8bbb627e8d69721f AT BY2PR03MB090 DOT namprd03 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<2ab36a85d8004fdb8bbb627e8d69721f@BY2PR03MB090.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 04:58:18PM +0000, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>" On May 17 16:45, Warren Young wrote:
>" > On 5/17/2013 12:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>" > >
>" > >Is that ENOFEL or EFLOCK?
>" > 
>" > It depends.  ENOFEL is the BSD way, but POSIX standardized the SysV
>" > error constant, EFLOCK.  Linux supports both, of course, so Cygwin
>" > should, too.
>"
>" Hmm.  I'm not too keen to add an error message fome something which
>" could be fixed instead.  Maybe we should consider to get us a cat
>" instead?
>
>So, you recommend re-installing the coreutils package, then?

I think we're now starting to litter this ml with indirect puns.

Perhaps we should paws to reflect if this is really wise.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -