X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=xQh
	Daz9hPKQw96gfulF60wrImL0ocqitPt8bJYWVNbppZH1VAIvEj0xKRSWYHIQDjxk
	wG7ZwfEKy4gU9sRh/ZrRdOVotnURz4rA2HJP2CO9xM2pkkF2EpFrpRCGPbaDLmVg
	zl6LC6qtWFlt72mx/bqKaL7N2sTVQ3798A6HWu1A=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=ZN1FRu1fT
	gnDAMAmoYyJ0sRdyvM=; b=R8ENLdntaB0yqcSygfAmm3ki+IpYXb70JuC9O4SGW
	6aTsnI8DNHaDjfSrS7mnF/0+B+cQ0uHCkf869M6PHFC6/FkNQX93meZXHmq9VWfS
	1eyRT+nIuAus+5vFlV/PcVcg4K1qQO2m47BZVR0M9zPOodi7FKDg2VcReX25NokC
	4c=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_DNSBL_BUMP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_PC,TW_UX,TW_XP autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Message-ID:	<518370B5.9090706@alice.it>
Date:	Fri, 03 May 2013 10:09:25 +0200
From:	Angelo Graziosi <angelo DOT graziosi AT alice DOT it>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: postgresql-devel package missing pg_config?

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> Do you see "linux64" and "linux64" a lot?  No?
>
> It should just be "cygwin".

if you read the citation [*], you will find,

...
linux                for i386 Linux with gcc >= 3
linuxicc             for i386 Linux with Intel's icc
...
linuxppcgcc          for PPC Linux with gcc
linuxppc64gcc        for PPC 64 Linux  with gcc >= 3
linuxx8664gcc        for x86-64 Linux with gcc >= 3.x
linuxx8664icc        for x86-64 Linux with Intel icc >=10.x
...
macosx               for MacOS X >= 10.4 with gcc
macosxicc            for MacOS X >= 10.4 with Intel icc (Intel only)
macosx64             for MacOS X >= 10.5 with gcc 4.0 64 bit mode

...


The first public release of ROOT was in 1995. Perhaps at that time they 
thought that 'win32gcc' was enough...

Anyway, I will try to suggest that they change the option in "cygwin"..


Ciao,
  Angelo.

---
[*] http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-05/msg00013.html

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -