Mail Archives: cygwin/2013/04/24/10:10:21
Maybe the below email should be a FAQ reference?
cgf
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:47:49PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Apr 24 14:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Apr 23 23:56, Christian Franke wrote:
>> > Possibly a __builtin_va_list related gcc bug.
>>
>> This is rather unlikely. That code is shared between Cygwin and
>> Mingw, and chances are that the bug would have been found already.
>>
>> What about a type issue? int vs. long?
>
>For clearness I decided to add a quick lecture. Hope that's ok.
>
>The Cygwin x86_64 toolchain is using the LP64(*) data model. That means,
>in contrast to Windows, which uses an LLP64(*) data model, sizeof(long)
>!= sizeof(int), just as on Linux.
>
>For comparison:
>
> Cygwin Windows Cygwin
> Linux x86_64 Linux
> Windows x86_64
> i686
>
>sizeof(int) 4 4 4
>sizeof(long) 4 4 8
>sizeof(size_t) 4 8 8
>sizeof(void*) 4 8 8
>
>This difference can result in interesting problems, especially when
>using Win32 functions, especially when using pointers to Windows
>datatypes like LONG, ULONG, DWORD. Given that Windows is LLP64, all of
>these are 4 byte in size, while `long' on Cygwin is 8 bytes.
>
>Take the example ReadFile:
>
> ReadFile (HANDLE, LPVOID, DWORD, LPDWORD, LPOVERLAPPED);
>
>In the 32 bit Cygwin and Mingw environments, as well as in the 64 bit
>Mingw environment, it is no problem to substitute DWORD with unsigned
>long:
>
> unsigned long number_of_bytes_read;
> [...]
> ReadFile (fhdl, buf, buflen, &number_of_bytes_read, NULL);
>
>However, in 64 bit Cygwin, using LP64, number_of_bytes_read is 8 bytes
>in size. But ReadFile expects a pointer to a 4 byte type. So the
>function will only change the lower 4 bytes of number_of_bytes_read,
>while the content of the upper 4 bytes is undefined.
>
>Here are a few donts which may help porting applications from the
>ILP32 to the new LP64 data model. Note that this is not a Cygwin-only
>problem. Many Linux applications suffered the same somewhat liberal
>handling of datatypes when x86_64 was new.
>
>- DON'T mix up int and long in printf/scanf. This:
>
> int i; long l;
> printf ("%d %ld\n", l, i);
>
> may not print what you think it should.
>
>- DON'T mix int and long pointers.
>
> int *ip = (int *) &my_long; /* Uh oh! */
>
>- DON'T mix int and pointers at all! THis will NOT work as expected
> anymore:
>
> void *ptr;
> printf ("Pointer value is %x\n", (int) ptr);
>
>- DON'T use functions returning pointers without declaration. For instance
>
> printf ("Error message is: %s\n", strerror (errno));
>
> This code will CRASH, unless you included string.h. The implicit
> rule in C is that an undeclared function is of type int. But int
> is 4 byte and pointers are 8 byte, so the string pointer given to
> printf is missing the upper 4 bytes. Hilarity ensues ;)
>
>- DON'T use C base types together with Win32 functions. Keep in mind
> that DWORD, LONG, ULONG are *not* the same as long and unsigned long.
> Try to use only Win32 datatypes in conjunction with Win32 API function
> calls to avoid type problems.
>
>- DON'T mix Windows dataypes with POSIX type-specific MIN/MAX values.
>
> unsigned long l_max = ULONG_MAX; /* That's right. */
> ULONG w32_biggest = ULONG_MAX; /* Hey, wait! What? */
> ULONG w32_biggest = UINT_MAX; /* Ok. */
>
> Always keep in mind that ULONG (or DWORD) != unsigned long but
> rather == unsigned int now.
>
>
>HTH,
>Corinna
>
>
>(*) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LLP64#64-bit_data_models
>
>--
>Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
>Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
>Red Hat
>
>--
>Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
>FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
>Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
>
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -