X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Sey
	XMsKkwC27ZLoOir0cMl4zKy7VI7wLy5e8Y+TJGp2E7zXJhItcZcNkUW1VuqfLaF7
	pBDqWu+XSzi68EMBhAiPNuCqa/QTlHTeCi4WdBF6U4hToVt4k+YXhlbjJOk/Q5Rl
	cmVgR+3NTLYrKkOm+NbNfpiIE+vaYgNxVLuxJmV4=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=JP2s3wQ+6
	i8xROa1VjPFmgc3RMU=; b=x5Ru0P0DphvM0ZIz779KePZvCsYU5QHnkWYbFhBiz
	QuhUshCNxytU58sCtr/ZZNbzvSB3OpiF3wCsIhPJ9oMHiHq6+WV+ZmNkmNr91rMe
	Gn4GrpmAzZkfh2XIMmaVwxCRPC+iBYfsQwx4xHa9qoXDt3pPoYAqj82e+KnZ4078
	Aw=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Message-ID:	<51766C22.10702@bahnhof.se>
Date:	Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:10:26 +0200
From:	Fredrik Rothamel <fredrik DOT rothamel AT bahnhof DOT se>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Difference in 32/64-bit curl.

Hi,

I just noticed that in 64-bit cygwin curl always include the 
http-headers in the response.
(Old behaviour is to only include headers when -i option is specified)

Is this an intentional change?
Makes some scripts misbehave...

BTW: Big thanks to the cygwin team for the 64-bit porting effort. Any 
way I can help?

Regards,
Fredrik

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -