X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=ystI1KwW6PLAKqo+h/b45GrAUvtOzpntRQZ/bUNalXSwrXkKbu+1P
	KJFPxkn+tcwFXzwpwOjgjpcj7MKIzNELXwCu6WYLYvUQzhfTYIbxNbDbox4WfIbi
	BWHM+E8ju1e/mDfghcnYaOHpg3zQQlV8y8lTDQXajCGSAASvEutuJw=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=PSI+GZiuN1Wk1cW0vOwF0Jbm0Ec=; b=Y3Zet/o3KFbr5Qkufl6c3MpZlaXD
	DCCh8ppDmF6AbxskG4XoWercf9LTfJyHZbJVnYikWWmPY/8Y8z8qLh1FrkhyR3Nj
	SxMe8TXf5BiSP7xGD99DlSBIYPh+GnAVHDbhGNyRfG/DkBVBQJz9We6sjmmLZPPu
	XW2/W7WJI7u0Prs=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,TW_BJ,TW_YG autolearn=no version=3.3.1
Date:	Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:52:45 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Issue with binutils-2.23.1-1
Message-ID:	<20130415165245.GC4639@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<CAGHJv4eeEsAoZUz2LOov1q3OKe0ZR5rNvrotLjH5JGadisro+A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAGHJv4dbEZS52DWXey8+sgmyR1Mp+yK0Q1Dg4LBAx84KMiSiNw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130415132155 DOT GC24092 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130415134809 DOT GA4639 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130415143733 DOT GC5992 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20130415143954 DOT GB4639 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130415151154 DOT GA7850 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20130415151154.GA7850@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Apr 15 11:11, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 04:39:54PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Apr 15 10:37, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 03:48:09PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> >On Apr 15 15:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> >> On Apr 15 08:54, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> >> >> > Hi All,
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > On 6 March 2013 08:40, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> >> >> > > I noticed a problem after upgrading to the 2.23.1-1 release of
> >> >> > > binutils that cygport was no longer generating debuginfo files.  After
> >> >> > > digging in to it a little and following up on the cygwin-ports mailing
> >> >> > > list, Yaakov determined that the objdump included in the 2.23.1
> >> >> > > release of binutils does not handle the "-l" flag properly.  Reverting
> >> >> > > to 2.22.51-2 solved the issue for me and Yaakov confirmed that the
> >> >> > > issue does not exist in CVS HEAD either.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > This issue has resurfaced in the 2.23.52.20130309 release of bintuils
> >> >> > currently shipping with Cygwin.  My cygport based packages are no
> >> >> > longer producing debuginfo packages.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Erm... 2.23.52-1 is a 64bit-only package.  I created all the debuginfo
> >> >> packages with this version.  32 bit is at 2.23.51-1, and I'm pretty
> >> >> sure I created the latest OpenSSH packages with that version, including
> >> >> debuginfo.
> >> >
> >> >Oh, hmm.  The 2.23.51-1 package actually contains the 2.23.52.20130309
> >> >binutils files, so never mind what I wrote.
> >> 
> >> Just to be clear: The current 32-bit version of binutils is 2.23.51-1.
> >> It was released to address the problems with objdump introduced by a,
> >> er, "illegal" upload by someone who was confused about binutils
> >> maintainership.  There is no 32-bit version named 2.23.52.20130309
> >> or 2.23.1-1.
> >
> >If you run `ld --version' on ld from the 2.23.51-1 package, it returns
> >"GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.23.52.20130309"
> 
> Again, the version that was uploaded in March was to fix the problem
> reported in this thread.

I was just pointing out the version mismatch.  The package is called
2.23.51, while the binaries claim to be 2.23.52.  I did not comment
on the behaviour.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -