X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=NBAx9aso5QLM/gs3
	YBqQZpgCKMNYlHH3c/oVKmjH3tvEqspLZnLFUhcsUd1lPafw+1vn2HX6BM6Ilr6y
	al1CU+0Fst907VJD2+cgp3isihK2cyHZBtbXExqyIRgZFwerTpggiNHj6Q4k/7du
	YATRZaLhaphqfXUTz9xrEm8A8Dk=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=rNnEqQ9yierqg0baGDIpx0
	ns4ag=; b=Z9+jzEVz82jbufHIIcKX/GDC4S7dlPnD5/9jqwgH8NS55oQB5OfwN7
	9aDXkOOxGwOurnTzQPqzANDk84u8kub236lgnL0lum/Gth6FpE17QU6PntJdu6Pi
	AiHwPyY654/OZykEASRcXkBEYJkcYvF+8zz7ZMvlCB7H1U95rXoiY=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Message-ID:	<5167C71F.4060409@alice.it>
Date:	Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:34:39 +0200
From:	Angelo Graziosi <angelo DOT graziosi AT alice DOT it>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Steve Kargl <sgk AT troutmask DOT apl DOT washington DOT edu>
CC:	Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, fortran <fortran AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org>
Subject:	Re: Cygwin with clock_gettime and CLOCK_MONOTONIC - gives always 0
References:	<51674473 DOT 3030704 AT alice DOT it> <20130411235912 DOT GA31328 AT troutmask DOT apl DOT washington DOT edu>
In-Reply-To:	<20130411235912.GA31328@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

Ciao Steve,

Il 12/04/2013 1.59, Steve Kargl ha scritto:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 01:17:07AM +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
>> Steve Kargl wrote
>>
>>> My
>>> disagreemnet is predicated on the stupidity of using a 10 line
>>> example subroutine without actually inspecting what it does on
>>> whatever OS that one chooses to use.
>>
>> It is just because one has tested that code that these problems came to
>> light... :-)
>>
>
> When testing, it would help if the results were properly
> represented as your initial subject line was "Random seed
> initialization".  It seems clear to at least me your testing

I DID that:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-04/msg00033.html


It is only at the end of it that was opened the new on Cygwin:

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-04/msg00184.html


BTW, it contains also the link to the first... :)


Ciao,
   Angelo.



> did not include actually inspecting what these two lines do:
>
>     CALL SYSTEM_CLOCK(COUNT=clock)
>     seed = clock + 37 * (/ (i-1), 1=1, n) /)
>
> because your subject would have been "SYSTEM_CLOCK is broken
> on cygwin".
>
> If you want to see an actual issue with "Random seed initialization"
> go read PR 52879.
>


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -