X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=vqqDT8SxGjC/HWyl
	1BZxFb3uLhh7FinnKJ49Oyi3QOwB0ssKqpzk3bfZHloAEQ5w9JbS17WUEM+EgJFr
	O1x8Vh+DN1cgHSsbTf1HBc56gQCTmEHEJjFx6rCJALcYlMo4ovuGyvKKb0oiz95R
	GgglFwKs0TRdevvRf+woPlVxbXk=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=ARNeve5H7u3j0qk+gjt+sM
	VUOxA=; b=fShHBtRnpm5SdQ7Hv0ijd+URRQ1t5L7777bStmI8PYHcloJCqDux8T
	Nxi6DzE/hOUIThVFLLGA78y6iVx04u9a69Y8KTzOwml1yDOPQbiLMbLZom8HVlXs
	YgKr17RUe1JGfP2srPIARf7ES1SLKSQ2MWfU/iNxWhzMErKACLVQo=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,BOTNET,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_LR,TW_RW,TW_WX,TW_XR autolearn=no version=3.3.1
Message-id:	<5164356C.2090707@cygwin.com>
Date:	Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:36:12 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Woitok AT RRZE DOT Uni-Erlangen DOT DE
Subject:	Re: Problem with symbolic links and Mercurial's "update" command
References:	<20836 DOT 12668 DOT 227270 DOT 356590 AT woitok DOT rrze DOT uni-erlangen DOT de>
In-reply-to:	<20836.12668.227270.356590@woitok.rrze.uni-erlangen.de>

On 4/9/2013 11:19 AM, Dr. Rainer Woitok wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> the problem  I'm having seems to  be either Mercurial or Cygwin related.
> I'm currently using Mercurial 2.4.2 and Cygwin 1.7.17, which I'm running
> with the "winsymlinks" option in the "CYGWIN" environment variable:
>
> @echo off
>
> set CYGWIN=glob:noignorecase proc_retry:10 nodosfilewarning winsymlinks
> set PATH=c:\cygwin\bin
>
> C:
> chdir C:\cygwin\bin
>
> sh --login -i
>
> Even though  the problem surfaced in a  rather large repository, I could
> reproduce it in an almost empty one, like this:
>
> $ hg --version
> Mercurial Distributed SCM (version 2.4.2)
> (see http://mercurial.selenic.com for more information)
>
> Copyright (C) 2005-2012 Matt Mackall and others
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> $ uname -a
> CYGWIN_NT-6.0 tablet 1.7.17(0.262/5/3) 2012-10-19 14:39 i686 Cygwin
> $ mkdir Test
> $ cd Test
> $ hg init
> $ touch a
> $ ln -s a la
> $ ls -l
> total 1
> -rw------- 1 Rainer none 0 Apr  9 15:37 a
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 Rainer none 1 Apr  9 15:37 la -> a
> $ hg add *
> $ hg status
> A a
> A la
> $ hg commit -m test.
> $ rm *
> $ hg status
> ! a
> ! la
> $ hg update -C
> 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
> $ ls -l
> total 1
> -rw------- 1 Rainer none 0 Apr  9 15:40 a
> -rw------- 1 Rainer none 1 Apr  9 15:40 la
> $ cat la
> a$
>
> Mind that while the first "ls" command shows "la" to be a symbolic link,
> the second  "ls"  and the "cat" commands show  "la"  to be a  plain file
> containing  the single  character file name  (without  trailing  newline
> character) the symbolic link was originally pointing to.
>
> Since I cannot  reproduce this link  killing behaviour under OpenSolaris
> using Mercurial 1.7.3  (a bit  outdated, yes, but  this is not  under my
> control :-),  I  suspect  this could  be Cygwin  rather  than  Mercurial
> related.
>
> Any help would be appreciated,  and please also  reply to me personally,
> as I am not subscribed to this list.

Does mecurial 2.5.2 help?  Does removing setting "nowinsymlinks" help?

Presumably, mercurial either isn't restoring the read-only attribute or
is munging the LNK suffix.  You might check these possibilities.


-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -