X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=ER
	crNlyMdHBtJeOiafNTu5AMeuJTKhkXy5h97+CD5RhyLS0Qw0yWhz9iPYgAGN9/q3
	4+2sKMcmobqKUPaNjPZIdePhsqoYPQAE7hT/B/4Xl26A52iRPCx2A/5J2a57dwh9
	+dDQWZDFYqZewHDcZtfMDdf32UisGmLVN1AzSFHKE=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=ubQbjyLm
	vcX+B0XlPg3I9XOg93M=; b=vWWKYIVv1HRMik0GukgJC4w7LpVmXgwjf56m36OT
	HD9NBeOQfR7mbgnywhL8/b3uPc8OfPY4wliiyxFGbntd4KyPLVoJZwW3AbhZJUwB
	2rX+cwWOiUyuQMWR6rCQuZA5oA5p6M0cC08+7xZXiszyoMNKpySDbusWUkUzsaB1
	G5Y=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.50.45.97 with SMTP id l1mr9516064igm.99.1365502069215; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 03:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<20130409091644.GJ10126@calimero.vinschen.de>
References:	<5163A190 DOT 2070906 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20130409091644 DOT GJ10126 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Date:	Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:07:49 +0200
Message-ID:	<CAEwic4agnv4bvGRWjkno+KGtjOVmC+Qpa1AODJZff-sDfY=Byw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Missing values in w32api enum
From:	Kai Tietz <ktietz70 AT googlemail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

2013/4/9 Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
> On Apr  9 01:05, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> The following are missing from the definition of enum
>> WELL_KNOWN_SID_TYPE in winnt.h:
>> [...]
>> Should I send this as a patch to mingw64.sf (are they the
>> maintainers of our w32api now?)
>
> Yes, and yes.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Corinna

I applied the missing enumerator values to mingw-w64's trunk at rev 5735.

Thanks for pointing me to this missing stuff.

Regards,
Kai

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -