X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=rhMoBdxGgmBWWARLCQ+OI6+QwwheGpQUE1pbDueRabFEyYU5bS72N
	cX+Umd/nzMyqA2W2qklV0wunPT7193+QHX9YlEUFCTlBjhajk1881bmn341oBN3t
	Qno8nlimb4XbdMoMDNX0w6b46qQQowyLW4yK+YIogQJxTTDs4c+VQE=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=96linL460ZAaho5r9ota2SXMlGk=; b=KBNwHzODi0c7OTebjlQKWJ0+N0bv
	n1Xh7OEmV8OO3+6Ct6HUqtbpzD+1PjHh9G38M9180u9ujJrsOlj8xe0gMXTo7v+H
	+UPANWrsVm99jReNEQOAi5ngYXGWcTCo2H6sa+LVhml+X7k8eXUHd5HlmBNChtyv
	Sv5YxBniermo0Rs=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Mail-Handler:	Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To:	abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User:	U2FsdGVkX18j278kF6C5MhCPSXpRYcmW
Date:	Fri, 5 Apr 2013 01:45:16 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: It does involve cygwin
Message-ID:	<20130405054516.GA3015@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20130405143711 DOT 3384 AT binki>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20130405143711.3384@binki>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 02:37:11PM +0900, wynfield AT gmail DOT com wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:59:01PM -0400, Eliot Moss wrote:
>> >On 4/4/2013 2:40 PM, Eliot Moss wrote:
>> ....snipped
>> If you have to enter MinGW land to perform what the OP wants then that
>> is a really clear indication that this is off-topic.
>
>That is illogical, just because the very good advice above explains a
>method of how it could be done using another system, does not make it
>irrelavant to cygwin.  That's like saying compiling can be done with
>Microsoft C, so gcc is not relevant to cygwin.

Perhaps you should read the description of what is on-topic for this
list at http://cygwin.com/lists.html .

>> I think we've seen an adequate amount of advice for how the OP can
>> proceed.  There was a suggestion that one could look at the disassembled
>> output from gcc to see how it does things.  That's probably the best
>> advice for how to proceed, regardless of the platform.
>
>Does this mean that you'll honor your word and take it off line to
>answer practical questions regarding this issue?

Now you're sounding delusional.

Please stop this.  First and only warning.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -