X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=i6syZ9AAPCoRcrE2mPJnXKDyscjfl6cL7yBkkIWTL+j
	12cA+EvCb7jfIr1E/GbSe0erv1yy6eFZo+z9okrzvq3b50VuDNi5eljI+Epyrjd9
	grqnf5BIlVzIcfT9Prm3YYxX9DCJmhBBvFV9l8fOCexfftDh9pweUuhYtj+SHx8c
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=da+I3yFW2ZUEMliJn89C4BqMB9A=; b=Vw/YmUT1OQeDPjsoy
	B8z7UetreEKM1r9X+YJmgD6IATWIXIaGOrEist9s5u2lR/TUPehGftrgESEa7BAg
	BYk6sV1njBb/lLcdHgvivvEHAZkQBHYZxztiB6cjRvo9ZXpfED2N0iPXZhxEgcVK
	TQjT9Kzr/ZMmt7nAbA2rHYJSbc=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Message-ID:	<515059C1.5040200@cs.utoronto.ca>
Date:	Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:05:53 -0400
From:	Ryan Johnson <ryan DOT johnson AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Fwd: reboot command behaves different on Linux
References:	<CAKf2h5Q7Ui7szcGKFMip5UUvurPnGTv=C=n-iXo8Wwo0qLP4YA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <514CE853 DOT 2000000 AT gmail DOT com> <CAKf2h5SpNNQYZ8afr-4WRB+HVpOcR+mq_cTZwoQNOd=67_SMBw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130323223138 DOT GB40309 AT justpickone DOT org> <CAKf2h5QK=Z2jroWZ_S0neHAfLCpEVAGrny8cdvgt3Wb_XLw9cw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CA+sc5mkrVyC8=3jvJK4cgbAH9XQFxotS01C7aMscaBu68VVVyQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CA+sc5mkrVyC8=3jvJK4cgbAH9XQFxotS01C7aMscaBu68VVVyQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 25/03/2013 9:40 AM, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Frank Fesevur wrote:
>> 2013/3/23 David T-G:
>>> % This would still conflict with the -H of the ones above, but I have no
>>> % problem with it. Anyone against changing hibernate to -H?
>>>
>>> What about 'b' for hi'b'ernate?
>> That was my original suggestion, but Anthony liked the -H better.
>>
>> I have given it a thought over the weekend and since the -H conflicts
>> with -H of the Linux shutdown commands, I think I prefer the -b as
>> short for hibernate.
> To me -b sounds like 'b;inary how about -s for 's'leep since sleep is
> synonymous with hibernate.
Sleep is synonymous with suspend(resume from low-power state) not 
hibernate (resume from powered-off state).

Ryan


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -