delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2013/03/11/18:13:40

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_IB
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Received: by 10.68.24.33 with SMTP id r1mr24038797pbf.139.1363039982319; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <513E56DF.5030005@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 06:12:47 +0800
From: JonY <10walls AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Why libquadmath0-4.7.2
References: <51361936 DOT 3010904 AT alice DOT it> <20130305162244 DOT GA2464 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <513E1C5C DOT 9060505 AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <513E1C5C.9060505@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

------enig2QVQEOGVPFJVCHNCFTNKB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 3/12/2013 02:03, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 05/03/2013 16:22, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:11:34PM +0100, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
>>> I have GCC-4.5.3 installed and I am not going to install the test=20
>>> version 4.7.2-1, but setup.exe *wants* to install libquadmath0-4.7.2-1=
=20
>>> even if I have selected "Curr" packages (which should exclude any=20
>>> reference to 4.7.2 version...).
>>>
>>> Have we sure it isn't a packaging bug?
>>
>> The crude dependency handling in setup.exe isn't up to the task of
>> allowing per-version dependencies.  So this probably came along because
>> it's required for a newer version of gcc.
>=20
>   When last we spoke (on the -apps list), it was suggested that the
> dependencies should remain correct for the curr: version, and people
> installing the test: version should manually install the required depende=
ncies.
>=20
>   If it would help, I could upload a 4.7.2-2 later tonight which restores=
 java
> and has the original 4.5.3-3 dependencies?

You'll be retaking maintainership again? I don't mind that, but please
push as much of the patches as possible upstream, it was kind of hard to
wrap my head around the patches to manually apply them.

Thanks.



------enig2QVQEOGVPFJVCHNCFTNKB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32)
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=EZ5b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------enig2QVQEOGVPFJVCHNCFTNKB--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019