X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-8.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_BJ,TW_YG
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Received:	by 10.68.138.225 with SMTP id qt1mr48930294pbb.82.1362608132423; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 14:15:32 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID:	<5137BFF2.40904@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 07 Mar 2013 06:15:14 +0800
From:	JonY <10walls AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Issue with binutils-2.23.1-1
References:	<CAGHJv4eeEsAoZUz2LOov1q3OKe0ZR5rNvrotLjH5JGadisro+A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130306165307 DOT GA2655 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To:	<20130306165307.GA2655@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

------enig2FWBGOHEBTBLTGLILNKTC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 3/7/2013 00:53, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 08:40:32AM -0500, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>> I noticed a problem after upgrading to the 2.23.1-1 release of
>> binutils that cygport was no longer generating debuginfo files.  After
>> digging in to it a little and following up on the cygwin-ports mailing
>> list, Yaakov determined that the objdump included in the 2.23.1
>> release of binutils does not handle the "-l" flag properly.  Reverting
>> to 2.22.51-2 solved the issue for me and Yaakov confirmed that the
>> issue does not exist in CVS HEAD either.
>=20
> Well, this is a strange development.
>=20
> I never uploaded a binutils-2.23.1-1 to sourceware.
>=20
> I've deleted the 2.23.1-1 version.

Sorry, I uploaded it as I thought it was also done by Dave, I asked over
IRC if I should remove it but got no response.

Anyway, binutils need updating, care to update it?




------enig2FWBGOHEBTBLTGLILNKTC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32)
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=VxT9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------enig2FWBGOHEBTBLTGLILNKTC--

- Raw text -