X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Received:	by 10.50.194.164 with SMTP id hx4mr9939562igc.35.1362562211298; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 01:30:11 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Wed, 6 Mar 2013 03:30:05 -0600
From:	Yaakov (Cygwin/X) <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Shouldn't gcc-4 depend on libmpfr4 ?
Message-ID:	<20130306033005.411192a5@YAAKOV04>
In-Reply-To:	<loom.20130305T115614-775@post.gmane.org>
References:	<CAEhDDbDwsH=CvsJXFFTgbrEhVp_-sUU-q-=tJONYaKP=m95Weg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5131CD7E DOT 8050001 AT gmail DOT com> <loom DOT 20130304T080048-222 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20130304090904 DOT GA5468 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20130304T110538-61 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20130304161925 DOT GA4078 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20130304T193416-681 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <CA+sc5mk2MgnjYA2OtaK7d7Aed_tpqXVoD=80NVQ6-uO=LNSUpw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <87ip57nf3r DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20130305034127 DOT 22dc8a65 AT YAAKOV04> <loom DOT 20130305T115614-775 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:59:32 +0000 (UTC), Achim Gratz wrote:
> Yaakov <yselkowitz <at> users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> > The problem is a hack in gmp's configure.ac which is incompatible with
> > newer libtool versions.
> 
> Oh now you tell me... :-) I've found the same in the meantime after mucking with
> the Win32_DLL red herring (that appears to be completely superfluous as well and
> not have seen an update in ages - see the library version numbers).  Anyway,
> since the last version to have libmp (BSD compatibility) is 5.0.5 and I can't
> easily tell if any other packages link against that, shouldn't Cygwin distribute
> this version until the dependencies have been sorted?

AFAIK nothing used the BSD compat layer, it was disabled by default
upstream, and Fedora has already updated to 5.1.  I think we can go
ahead and do the same.


Yaakov




--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -