X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_YG
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Achim Gratz <Stromeko AT NexGo DOT DE>
Subject:	Re: Shouldn't gcc-4 depend on libmpfr4 ?
Date:	Tue, 5 Mar 2013 13:58:07 +0000 (UTC)
Lines:	20
Message-ID:	<loom.20130305T145013-818@post.gmane.org>
References:	<CAEhDDbDwsH=CvsJXFFTgbrEhVp_-sUU-q-=tJONYaKP=m95Weg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5131CD7E DOT 8050001 AT gmail DOT com> <loom DOT 20130304T080048-222 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20130304090904 DOT GA5468 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20130304T110538-61 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20130304161925 DOT GA4078 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20130304T193416-681 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <CA+sc5mk2MgnjYA2OtaK7d7Aed_tpqXVoD=80NVQ6-uO=LNSUpw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <87ip57nf3r DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20130305034127 DOT 22dc8a65 AT YAAKOV04>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi Yaakov,

I'm getting:

> *** Info: No debug files, skipping debuginfo subpackage
> 
> >>> Checking packages for missing or duplicate files
> *** Warning: Packages are missing files:
> -usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/cygmpfr-4.dll.dbg

It seems cygport is not picking up the debuginfo files and leaves them
unpackaged.  Why is this happening, is there anything I can do about this?

Also, you've changed the packaging in these cygport files (the shared components
were in the ${PN} package before), was this intentional?


Regards,
Achim.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -