X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=/to7ovasA1oujLjIUiFzOSxiMeXjdXhDjgefyabH/Sw=; b=RKVEoOEw+IfWV0ZREOOd2ZCGS816PpEJq6e0+KJPmURHbq09CZVbqK/C6Rdm4sdgy4 Ehj0yClvnjsj5q+HYySl1PN4Ft+ms+4LnMKJtP9QBPeXAU34shIV6pzhBALpsrypmb6j SYLiknnm+aA/Wzax2Ix2aE/xtDabJw9DhTf0/m3dj2O7ZtnbOVc9qubo4gMk9UQ34YFz gX7KWZz8ghAqMWEWJyog/O7uhnUb+tonMkfAJjoynNM4oms1FGTbR6obctfq+rTiJx7I dOQJfEK/8RkA9mxuWub5Mkwjkydq/muPEs8Hv2EXRPRUJ3EWuOzJjmIdXRkqmVwQYYu9 O+Qg==
X-Received:	by 10.224.181.16 with SMTP id bw16mr5793475qab.58.1361205595893; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:39:55 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID:	<51225959.1090809@centrych.org>
Date:	Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:39:53 -0500
From:	Centrych Administrator <admin AT centrych DOT org>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Is this a bug or a behavior?
References:	<511BBBD4 DOT 8090902 AT fastmail DOT fm> <CE9C056E12502146A72FD81290379E9A608E7C64 AT ENFIRHMBX1 DOT datcon DOT co DOT uk> <511DC7A4 DOT 80701 AT centrych DOT org> <511E667D DOT 6020000 AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<511E667D.6020000@cygwin.com>
X-Gm-Message-State:	ALoCoQlGzsqOVz9aCo7QBkL2ZFz41whr3jYl9WKBVuUGVP5pCLTFV3nG6oFNjfi7FW0ECL4qmegw
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 02/15/2013 11:46 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> I believe these questions are the crux of your inquiry so I've stripped
> out the surrounding details.  Apologies if you feel I've removed 
> something
> you feel is a significant point.
>
> This goes to the heart of a difference between how Windows and Linux 
> treat
> executables and various ingrained assumptions both make about their
> respective expectations (essentially what Adam said ;-) ).  Cygwin 
> does try
> to bridge this gap but it has its limits as well.  This is actually not
> new issue and has been discussed many times in the past on this list.  If
> you're interested in the details or, even better, in improving what's
> currently implemented, I'd recommend reviewing previous discussions, the
> ideas they generated, and the issues and limitations mentioned. That
> should help you understand the current state and provide you with an
> informed basis if you want to take a swing at providing some patch.
>
> The only short answer I can give you is that the current state is a 
> compromise.  That doesn't mean there isn't a better one.  Just that 
> it's a complicated area for many reasons so getting to a better state 
> is also complicated.

Fair enough.  I'd like to take a crack at it once I clear some other 
things off of my plate first.  Will have to look through previous 
conversations before I know if it's something I can competently tackle.

Thanks.

-jack-


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -