X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<511967DD.8030600@etr-usa.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:51:25 -0700
From:	Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Cygwin-L <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Promote sqlite 3.7.13-1 from test status?
References:	<announce DOT 5029275C DOT 4040009 AT etr-usa DOT com> <502C0B7D DOT 10909 AT etr-usa DOT com> <loom DOT 20120816T092134-266 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20120816085016 DOT GB5536 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <502CCBB1 DOT 2070600 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20120816105507 DOT GD17546 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <502CE120 DOT 4050900 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20120816122654 DOT GG17546 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <502D1967 DOT 7090705 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20120816160656 DOT M21257 AT ds DOT net> <502D3A5C DOT 7010500 AT etr-usa DOT com> <00ad01cd7bf6$7cc68a50$76539ef0$@motionview3d.com> <1345169297 DOT 10004 DOT 10 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> <87k3qmedzh DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <51194F7F DOT 8050403 AT etr-usa DOT com> <87halio886 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>
In-Reply-To:	<87halio886.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 2/11/2013 14:23, Achim Gratz wrote:
>
> Warren Young writes:
>>  From my perspective, though, I have a new problem, which is scraping
>> together enough free time to set up the SQLite test suite on a machine
>> here and set it to grinding, so I can exonerate the recent .15.1
>> build.
>
> That's the second time I hear you talking about running the test suite
> for SQLite… where'd you get that from?

 From where?  Nowhere.  I decided it would be a good idea all by myself.

As I saw it, I released some test builds, they caused a new problem, so 
I thought it would be a good idea to see if SQLite's own test suite[*] 
gave the same results on both .13 and .15.1.  If so, then there is no 
regression on Cygwin from that perspective, so that adds a reason not to 
consider the BDB failures with Cygwin Subversion a problem.

[*] https://www.sqlite.org/testing.html

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -