X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:08:04 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Binutils objcopy bug (was Re: rebase segfault)
Message-ID:	<20130124120804.GA32717@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20130115112406 DOT GA13752 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <50F5D246 DOT 6010902 AT gmail DOT com> <50F653AB DOT 80102 AT gmail DOT com> <20130116123509 DOT GA16991 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <50F6AD63 DOT 8080106 AT gmail DOT com> <20130124030145 DOT 22fa143f AT YAAKOV04> <20130124092746 DOT GC8311 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <510103AF DOT 3080305 AT gmail DOT com> <20130124100037 DOT GB24121 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <510109F8 DOT 5020504 AT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<510109F8.5020504@gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Jan 24 11:16, marco atzeri wrote:
> On 1/24/2013 11:00 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Jan 24 10:49, marco atzeri wrote:
> >>Please note that rebase segfaults on dict_snowball.dll the first time
> >>but any subsequent rebasing, also with different start address,
> >>works without any problem, so it is possible that we had other
> >>dll with the same problem but we never noticed
> >
> >I already explained why:  The SEGV happens during relocation.
> >The file header has been changed already.  If you call the
> >same rebase, it will try to rebase the file to the same new
> >address.  If current file base address == requested file base
> >address, rebase will return without performing any action.
> 
> I was not clear.
> Also rebasing with a different address make no difference

It does for me:

  $ rebase -b 0x40000000 dict_snowball.dll
  Segmentation fault
  $ rebase -b 0x50000000 dict_snowball.dll
  Segmentation fault
  $ rebase -b 0x40000000 dict_snowball.dll
  Segmentation fault
  $


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -