X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Sat, 19 Jan 2013 00:18:39 +0400
From:	Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru>
Reply-To:	Andrey Repin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-ID:	<1213214325.20130119001839@mtu-net.ru>
To:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: rtorrent and recent snapshots - apparent problem with msync()
In-Reply-To:	<20130118160742.GH11791@calimero.vinschen.de>
References:	<CAGHJv4fiyojmQGR_d4=Pv1q9dtJogbcfCKBj_LtWyYsLYOFBGQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130117062415 DOT GB24529 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAGHJv4cTsRD5km3oSmBy2BbWGTvL2mfbU9xRMPbnj2XCLN7HgQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAGHJv4cAm+v_VuKXxjdriTN-d-AoQfengNEFY+MqZOAnOsH0-Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130118003522 DOT GA1913 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20130118093205 DOT GB11791 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130118154352 DOT GA23471 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20130118160742 DOT GH11791 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!

>> I saw that you made another change to this function.  Is it possible that
>> this might actually fix the "rtorrent problem"?

> No.  It only adds the MS_SYNC handling.  rtorrent uses MS_ASYNC.

That made me think... If rtorrent uses MS_ASYNC, shouldn't *rtorrent* be
prepared for consequences? Instead of you trying to satisfy its
expectations?

> I think there's basically no way around the loop.  I'm just still
> wondering if we shouldn't add a cygwait() call to handle signals
> during the wait time.


--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru) 19.01.2013, <00:15>

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -