X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_HEX
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Sun, 13 Jan 2013 21:11:44 -0800 (PST)
From:	YZFury <yzfury AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3e6368c8-5f18-496c-b677-cf499369b3be@email.android.com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAPF-yObDjWtx5bQEmCk1nCzoo-razSns+yvq2VXsnv2d+PYX_w@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<1358135756673-95377 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com> <CAPF-yObDjWtx5bQEmCk1nCzoo-razSns+yvq2VXsnv2d+PYX_w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Using the free(*ptr) routine and getting an exception, "Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION"
MIME-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Whoops.   I was making the pointer point to x instead of putting x's value in the memory that was just allocated.   Now i understand that. Really sorry for a stupid syntax error question on my part. thanks for the quick reply though :).  Like I said basically new to C. 

Sent from my Kindle Fire



_____________________________________________
From: "Dan Kegel-2 [via Cygwin]" <ml-node+s1069669n95381h52 AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com>
Sent: Sun Jan 13 23:52:50 EST 2013
To: YZFury <yzfury AT gmail DOT com>
Subject: Re: Using the free(*ptr) routine and getting an exception, "Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION"


	On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:55 PM, YZFury <[hidden email]> wrote: 
> int *ptr = malloc(sizeof(*ptr)); 
>         int x = 87; 
>         ptr = &x; 
>         printf("%d", *ptr); 
>         free(ptr);//it goes wrong here 

As you probably know, you can't call free() on a pointer 
that didn't come from malloc().  ptr's first value came from malloc, 
but you overwrote that with 
   ptr = &x; 
Perhaps you meant 
   *ptr = x; 
So you're a level of indirection off. 
- Dan 

-- 
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

	 	 	 	
	
	_____________________________________________
	

		

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

		http://cygwin.1069669.n5.nabble.com/Using-the-free-ptr-routine-and-getting-an-exception-Exception-STATUS-ACCESS-VIOLATION-tp95377p95381.html 	

	

		 		To unsubscribe from Using the free(*ptr) routine and getting an exception, "Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION", click here.
		NAML 	





--
View this message in context: http://cygwin.1069669.n5.nabble.com/Using-the-free-ptr-routine-and-getting-an-exception-Exception-STATUS-ACCESS-VIOLATION-tp95377p95382.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -