X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:34:02 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: select() not interrupted by signals
Message-ID:	<20130111133402.GG17162@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<50EFD041 DOT 4090108 AT towo DOT net> <20130111085256 DOT GC17162 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <50F00BD5 DOT 9090405 AT towo DOT net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<50F00BD5.9090405@towo.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Jan 11 13:55, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> On 11.01.2013 09:52, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Jan 11 09:41, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> >>I had previously reported "select() hanging after terminal killed"
> >>(http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-05/msg00418.html).
> >>It turns out that select() does not get interrupted by a SIGWINCH
> >>signal either (with likely the same cause).
> >>This raises problems with interactive programs that want to react to
> >>window size changes (like text editors).
> >>
> >>See attached updated test case; run the program, while select() is
> >>waiting (before 5 second timeout each), change window size and see
> >>no interrupt.
> >>On other systems, select() is interrupted (test case: from mintty,
> >>remote login to SunOS; also showing the terminal is not involved in
> >>the problem).
> >>
> >>This bug did not exist in cygwin 1.5; I see some Changelog entries
> >>from 2011-12-13 or 2012-01-22 which might be related.
> >Just for clarity, did you test with the latest snapshot?
> No, with the source package of the latest release.
> And I can't test with the snapshot as it doesn't compile here (after
> fresh download and unpack):

You could test using the binary...

> In file included from /usr/src/cygwin-snapshot-20130107-1/newlib/libc/include/sys/types.h:61:0,
>                  from ../../.././winsup/cygwin/winsup.h:29,
>                  from
> ../../.././winsup/cygwin/lib/_cygwin_crt0_common.cc:11:
> /usr/src/cygwin-snapshot-20130107-1/newlib/libc/include/sys/_types.h:63:20:
> schwerwiegender Fehler: stddef.h: No such file or directory
> Kompilierung beendet.

stddef.h is provided by the compiler:

$ ls -l /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.5.3/include/stddef.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 corinna vinschen 12542 Oct 23  2011 /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.5.3/include/stddef.h
$ cygcheck -f /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.5.3/include/stddef.h
gcc4-core-4.5.3-3

I don't see how this can fail.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -