delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2012/12/16/00:16:06

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/9p5FsUMqAsj+vO/QPoXxB
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 00:15:44 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: ps questions --
Message-ID: <20121216051544.GA4324@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <201212160346 DOT qBG3kOEo007681 AT expert DOT ics DOT purdue DOT edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201212160346.qBG3kOEo007681@expert.ics.purdue.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:46:24PM -0500, Paul Townsend wrote:
>In the
>
>http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00477.html
>
>message, I found
>
>- Two changes in the `ps -W' output.  `ps -W' now prints all processes on
>  the machine when running under an (elevated) administrator account,
>  not only the processes in the current session.
>
>Shouldn't the above restriction be documented in the `ps' man page?
>
>Question1 - why the "administrative" restriction?  The normal user seems
>to be able to run the Task Manager as him/herself and all of the running
>processes are listed.  Is there a silent privilege escalation there
>somewhere in the Task Manager process that allows the "full" listing?
>I do note that the Task Manager seems to be able to kill just about any
>process.
>
>Question2 - the UID of the Windows processes is listed as 0 in the
>`ps -W' output so is there a way to acquire and print it?  Task Manager
>does know the owner so there must be a Windows function to get it.

I'm sure there is but I doubt that anyone is particularly interested in
adding this functionality.

>Question3 - the PPID of the Windows process is listed as 0 also.  I did
>find some functions at Microsoft that could be used for that purpose.
>Are they available within the Cygwin code?

No.

The listing of windows processes in Cygwin ps is basically "as-is".
What you see is what you get.  If you are looking for a robust
command-line utility for listing Windows processes, I'm sure there are
better tools than Cygwin's ps.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019