X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,EXECUTABLE_URI,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<50C881E7.6090600@etr-usa.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Dec 2012 06:08:55 -0700
From:	Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Cygwin-L <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: ctags recursion broken? [ATTN: ctags, xemacs-tags maintainers]
References:	<786EBDA1AC46254B813E200779E7AD36028CB12E AT srv1163ex1 DOT flightsafety DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<786EBDA1AC46254B813E200779E7AD36028CB12E@srv1163ex1.flightsafety.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 12/11/2012 13:05, Thrall, Bryan wrote:
> Yes, it looks like xemacs-tags and ctags packages both install
> /usr/bin/ctags.exe:
>
> http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=ctags.exe

Is there an especially good reason xemacs-tags can't depend on ctags, 
and get its ctags.exe from my package?

Or, is there something special about Xemacs ctags that's worth preserving?

Or, maybe ctags.exe should just be removed from the Xemacs package. 
Doesn't Emacs want you to use etags anyway?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -