X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=dx3cSp8BOmSu/LlqGO0npdqo5u8sOcAkAqnkcCU7L1I=; b=RH5UIMvY06m1JK8AXfanTSBBxfEJa1uDYb4iJGWA2WC7nbSTbp9tdyp4sBFch2xtan HRzkLQ6o7rsg+zW/S3jrdkW+5nHFzhjNZJnvfIk9WtSNTmxhXijrodOv87nhRbsSlgaW XIFPJWPo1LGEK4KT0bTd3oaPb1uUJHWFVf3kFzUlL09kTkbuC10iDuyxmQVkuFAbhBwe vHJXnPGenv7RLowDaKe8FDy2GVIaIWZITqFHkLmEmjdEEgq9jhXHbzKwcqupZxgAuY9G KfRV3lnIqwlrVCDcEX9exYmlpVlbEGsH1YsW/RvdXigPJDyYJ9e8H5JALgUMwNs3vTtX 9fOA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Tue, 4 Dec 2012 16:34:46 -0500
Message-ID:	<CAMgm8F0K9juGwfGy9DZ=DXMqWNkOk04fR_NUox+fGTwDW56Uug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Bug in Cygwin Windows 8 group permissions
From:	Chaz Littlejohn <chaz AT pokeit DOT co>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Gm-Message-State:	ALoCoQm3izv1B0icCXuKvxsfFJzNGplC9FEZmwFNPdhBRhdRbgkc21KmXGSBgSFhkkFQMPk9fC3m
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> > By my understanding, if you're
> > distributing GPLv3+ software such as cygwin1.dll, these are not rights
> > you can withhold on that software.

> This is true for all GPL versions.  Cygwin's license is GPL with an
> exception to allow any Open Source product to not be infected but that
> is the limit.  You cannot create proprietary software without paying
> Redhat for that privilege; they do offer an alternative license.  See
> http://cygwin.com/licensing.html for details.

Stop me if i'm wrong, but since the program only invokes the plugin by
exec, and the program is not using the dlls or sharing data, it's my
understanding that they're considered separate programs under GPL3 and
the licensing requirements do not apply.

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#NFUseGPLPlugins

Chaz

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -