X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_NEUTRAL,TW_GT
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<50BCBEE5.7010704@cornell.edu>
Date:	Mon, 03 Dec 2012 10:01:57 -0500
From:	Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Updated: emacs*-24.2.90-1 (TEST)
References:	<announce DOT 50BB4D0D DOT 7010204 AT cornell DOT edu> <loom DOT 20121203T102613-270 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <50BC99F8 DOT 2070404 AT cornell DOT edu> <loom DOT 20121203T135757-74 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<loom.20121203T135757-74@post.gmane.org>
X-PMX-CORNELL-SPAM-CHECKED:	Pawpaw
X-Original-Sender:	kbrown AT cornell DOT edu - Mon Dec 3 10:03:02 2012
X-PMX-CORNELL-REASON:	CU_White_List_Override
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 12/3/2012 8:09 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu> writes:
>> I'm not sure what you mean by "without Gtk".  Do you want some other X
>> toolkit, such as Lucid or Motif?  Or no X toolkit?  What would be the
>> advantage of that?  The emacs build uses Gtk by default, so I would need
>> a good reason to do something different on Cygwin.
>
> openSUSE offers emacs-nox, emacs-x11 and emacs-gtk binaries and subpackages;
> emacs-x11 is built with Athena Widgets IIRC and does so precisely to avoid
> forcing the many dbus/Gtk dependencies onto systems that have no use for it
> otherwise.  I've been trying to keep a "lean" X11 alternative for my Cygwin
> installation here that does not pull in all that desktop infrastructure, but it
> seems I'm losing that battle anyway (both on the Gnome and the KDE/Qt front).

I can understand the motivation, but I really don't think Cygwin needs 
yet another emacs package, especially if it differs from the upstream 
defaults.  FWIW, I just checked Fedora 17.  On that system, `yum install 
emacs' gives you Emacs 24.1 with GTK+-2, which was the upstream default 
when Emacs 24.1 was released.  I also saw an emacs-nox package, but I 
didn't see Emacs built with an X toolkit other than Gtk.

Ken


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -