X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-id:	<50899C0F.8020304@cygwin.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:07:43 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Emacs crashing on C-x C-g
References:	<5069E625 DOT 9050803 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <5069EA0D DOT 7080303 AT cornell DOT edu> <5069F83D DOT 5060502 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <5087E872 DOT 4070902 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <50885727 DOT 4050305 AT cornell DOT edu> <50885D17 DOT 9090101 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <50894F58 DOT 6050000 AT cornell DOT edu> <508952E5 DOT 70200 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <50895454 DOT 3040406 AT redhat DOT com> <83sj92a3vl DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <5089718A DOT 6020709 AT gmail DOT com>
In-reply-to:	<5089718A.6020709@gmail.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 10/25/2012 1:06 PM, ping wrote:
> On 10/25/2012 12:54 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:01:40 -0600
>>> From: Eric Blake <eblake AT redhat DOT com>
>>>
>>> On 10/25/2012 08:55 AM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
>>>>>>>    http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12697
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I imagine it will be fixed before the release of Emacs 24.3.
>>>>>> Agree the initial part is emacs. But I suspect the confused bash
>>>>>> business is not. ^G should either send SIGINT or not, this core dump
>>>>>> thing is not cool.
>>>>> Do you know whether this is Cygwin-specific?  Have you checked to see
>>>>> what happens on Linux?
>>>> Oops, you're right: I see the exact same behavior on linux. However,
>>>> that's via ssh in a mintty window, so it could still be mintty. Can
>>>> somebody running Linux directly verify, perhaps?
>>> Linux (at least my setup on Fedora 17) has the same problem - when using
>>> emacs as the editor under 'git commit', an ill-timed ctrl-G on my part
>>> unceremoniously kills emacs as a result of sending the SIGINT to the
>>> entire process group.  I hate the behavior, but it is definitely not
>>> cygwin-specific.
>> Why doesn't git block SIGINT when it invokes $EDITOR?  I think that's
>> the prudent thing to do.
> the simplest solution: change to vim.
> I don't know of any extra benefit using emacs instead of vim...

It's been 3 hours and not a single flame.  Have the Editor Wars
actually died out?  Maybe there's hope for peace in the Middle East
too. ;-)

(Please interpret the above as an attempt at humor and not a plea
to restart debates on the best editor.)

--
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -