Mail Archives: cygwin/2012/10/24/03:56:10
On Oct 23 19:07, Bob Heckel wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Keith Christian wrote:
> >
> > w3m works, but appears to run slowly after the last update. While
> > comparing the output of "cygcheck -s -r -v" I noticed some
> > differences.
>
> Sorry you're having trouble. Strange, I did benchmarking in
> development and found 0.5.3 slightly faster than 0.5.2
>
> > Line 24 below shows Incomplete.
>
> I'm not sure what's causing that, I show "OK" on my installations.
>
> > I re-ran setup.exe, removed w3m, then re-installed from the same
> > mirror, no change.
>
> Did you have 0.5.2 installed previously?
>
> > Is this output satisfactory, or is there a corrective action for this
> > package post-install?
>
> I can't replicate it currently, I'll look into it further over the
> next few days and report back or up-version if I see anything wrong or
> fixable.
>
> If anyone else is experiencing w3m-0.5.3-1 trouble, that would be good to know.
I just had a look into the tar archive, and I see two weirdnesses
in terms of the directory entries in the archive.
- The permissions of all dirs are 700, but they should be 755, ideally.
- Dir entries in a tar archive usually have a trailing slash. In
w3m-0.5.3-1.tar.bz2 they don't.
Maybe that's what cygcheck is choking about. Incidentally the
w3m-0.5.2-2.tar.bz2 archive looks "normal".
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -